Bild på författaren.

Jonathan Steinberg (1) (1934–2021)

Författare till Bismarck: A Life

För andra författare vid namn Jonathan Steinberg, se särskiljningssidan.

12 verk 643 medlemmar 15 recensioner

Om författaren

Jonathan Steinberg is the Walter H. Annenberg Professor of Modern European History at the University of Pennsylvania, and Emeritus Fellow at Trinity Hall, Cambridge. His books include Yesterday's Deterrent: Tirpitz and the Birth of the German Battle Fleet and All or Nothing: The Axis and the visa mer Holocaust 1941-1943. visa färre

Verk av Jonathan Steinberg

Taggad

Allmänna fakta

Medlemmar

Recensioner

La Germania nazista e l'Italia fascista erano unite da una «brutale amicizia» nell'alleanza dell'Asse. Ambedue avevano selvagge leggi razziali: sia Hitler che Mussolini denunciarono fortemente la «minaccia ebraica». Tuttavia le due nazioni trattarono gli Ebrei in modo piuttosto diverso.

Tra il 1941 e il 1943 le forze italiane di occupazione in Croazia, Grecia e Francia si opposero con successo ai piani tedeschi di deportazione e sterminio degli Ebrei, il tutto contravvenendo agli ordini impartiti da Roma.

Mentre gli Ebrei che caddero nelle mani dell'esercito tedesco furono relegati nei campi di concentramento, non ci fu un solo Ebreo, preso dagli Italiani, che subì la stessa sorte. Gli ufficiali italiani non protessero solamente gli ebrei italiani, ma i rifugiati ebrei di ogni nazionalità.

Questo volume nasce dalla consultazione delle diverse fonti documentali che dimostrarono una ricerca estremamente ampia ed accurata.
Jonathan Steinberg ricostruisce questa storia toccante e singolare per districare i motivi e le forze che hanno sostenuto sia il nazismo che il fascismo, in un tentativo di risolvere la domanda fondamentale: perché? (fonte: retro di copertina)
… (mer)
 
Flaggad
MemorialeSardoShoah | Nov 20, 2022 |
Þessir fyrirlestrar fjalla um sögu Evrópu á tímabilinu 1715-1914. Kennarinn Jonathan Steinberg gerir skemmtilega tilraun til að skoða þennan tíma sem einkenndist af örum breytingum í gegnum líf þekktra persóna sem eru að hans mati einkennandi eða brautryðjendur mismunandi strauma og stefna þessa tíma þegar síðmiðöldum lýkur og upphaf nútímans hefst.
Steinberg fjallar vel um tímabilið sjálft og þær breytingar sem urðu með og einkenndu þessa einstaklinga en sem gefur að skilja verður ævisaga persónanna stundum æði stuttaraleg.… (mer)
 
Flaggad
SkuliSael | 1 annan recension | Apr 28, 2022 |
Otto von Bismarck was a towering figure in the late nineteenth century. In this 2011 biography Bismarck: A Life, Jonathan Steinberg argues that accomplishments and triumphs achieved by this historic statesman stemmed from the force of his personality. What was this personality? While he could be charming and witty, he was a narcissistic bully who shamelessly used people, even his own children. Bismarck lied repeatedly, openly, and could never tolerate being wrong on anything. He demanded absolute loyalty but gave none in return. He betrayed those who supported him. He hated his enemies with a Nixonian passion and could be equally paranoid in interpreting the motives of others.

Politically, Bismarck was a master strategist who played the long game, looking years in the future. He was an equally ingenious tactician combining multiple plans and options, setting different constituencies and factions off one another. He used any means necessary to gain an advantage and accomplish his goals. His drive to unify Germany took three wars that he essentially precipitated. Bismarck’s extraordinary successes and ability to make the big play when needed, accounts for his longevity.

Lacking any adherence to an external ideology, Bismarck was a party of one. His objective was to maintain and enhance his own power. Although he depended on the will of the sovereign, his intensely histrionic performances full of threats and offers to resignation played King and later Emperor William I. The old monarch once commented that Bismarck was more important to Germany than he was. Steinberg points out how lucky Bismarck was that William I lived to be ninety years old. These pathetic emotional performances fueled Bismarck’s hypochondria, gluttony, and frayed his nerves to the breaking point time and time again. It did not help that Bismarck refused to share power or delegate tasks. Instead, he kept all the decision making – and stress -- concentrated in his own hands.

Unfortunately, such personal control over the construction of a united Germany infused the state with some significant flaws. In international affairs, he set the stage for the alliance system that would become a contributing factor to the First World War. On the domestic scene, his lack of respect for the legislative branch (such as it was) remained a feature of German politics until 1918. His playing groups off one another hampered national unity and plagued social relations. His intense anti-Semitism was a harbinger of much worse to come.

I came away from this biography convinced Bismarck was a thoroughly repellant person.

There are several things that I liked about the book. First, it was focused and coherent with clear arguments. That is an accomplishment with a subject so full of contradictions with both stunning accomplishments and total failures. Second, I liked the liberal use of primary source block quotations. Typically, I prefer them to be used sparingly, but Steinberg skillfully uses them to build the story and give the reader a sense of the times and what people thought. And, finally, I liked the authorial voice. Steinberg is present and part of the conversation, sharing his opinions and thoughts with the reader.

There were a few negatives. First, I felt a lack of context to some issues. I do think that I understood some of the political issues, especially around German unification and the Prussian king’s attitude towards it ,because I read Christopher Clark’s Iron Kingdom as well (a work Steinberg cites) simultaneously. Ditto the Prussian culture of Bismarck’s time. I certainly would have struggled to grasp them had I not been reading Iron Kingdom. Second, I think Steinberg handles Bismarck’s marriage well, but his children go almost unmentioned until they are adults (at which point Bismarck dominates and uses them as he did to everyone else). His eldest son first appears in the text when he is thirty-one or two years old on page 406. The index is organized around people, not subjects. As an active index user, I found this quirky and a little frustrating.

As a Gilded Age Americanist, I could not fail to notice Bismarck’s political domination in the decades when, except for Abraham Lincoln, the presidency of the United States was at its weakest point. Still, on a personal level, I would much rather hang out with Chester Arthur than Otto von Bismarck.
… (mer)
 
Flaggad
gregdehler | 8 andra recensioner | Feb 4, 2022 |
The answer, it turns out, is "because Switzerland".
 
Flaggad
st3t | 2 andra recensioner | Aug 3, 2020 |

Priser

Du skulle kanske också gilla

Statistik

Verk
12
Medlemmar
643
Popularitet
#39,230
Betyg
½ 3.7
Recensioner
15
ISBN
55
Språk
8

Tabeller & diagram