Medlemmar med AsYouKnow_Bobs böcker

RSS-flöden

Nyligen upplagda böcker

AsYouKnow_Bobs recensioner

Recensioner av AsYouKnow_Bobs böcker, förutom AsYouKnow_Bobs

 

Medlem: AsYouKnow_Bob

Bibliotek13,047 böckerse bibliotek

Recensioner120 recensionerse recensioner

Molntaggmoln, författarmoln

Taggarsf (7,246), science fiction (5,654), DAW (1,401), fantasy (1,314), new (1,205), anthology (1,196), 1995 (1,147), 1996 (1,053), 2007 (1,027), main sequence (983) — se alla taggar

Grupper18th-19th Century Britain, 20th Century British Realism, Ace Doubles, Albany NY Area Science Fiction Fans, American Politics, American Revolution & Founding Fathers History, anarchism, Annus mirabilis, Astronomy & Astrophysics, Baker Street and Beyondvisa alla grupper

FavoritförfattareAbdul Alhazred, Kingsley Amis, Poul Anderson, Anonymous, Assorted Authors, Ann Beattie, Elizabeth Bowen, Buddha, Noam Chomsky, Avram Davidson, Richard Dawkins, Samuel R. Delany, Peter DeVries, Barbara Ehrenreich, Loren C. Eiseley, Brian Eno, John M. Ford, Frederick R Ewing, Alice Fulton, Gang of Four, Anonymous, Almighty God, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Stephen Jay Gould, Michael Harrington, George Herriman, Christopher Hill, Nick Hornby, The Jam, Joy Division, R. A. Lafferty, Ken MacLeod, John McPhee, George Orwell, Samuel Pepys, Barbara Pym, Keith Roberts, Sonny Rollins, Bertrand Russell, Marquis de Sade, Satan, Robert Sheckley, Cordwainer Smith, Sonic Youth, Neal Stephenson, Max Stirner, Charles Stross, The Smiths, Hunter S. Thompson, Gore Vidal, John Wain, Howard Waldrop, Gerrard Winstanley, P.G. Wodehouse, Various Writers (Delade favoriter)

FavoritbokhandelAmherst Books, Bakka-Phoenix, Blackwell's (Oxford), Bookmarks, Fantasy Centre, Hay Cinema Bookshop, Librarium, North Country Books [closed], Raven Used Book Shop, Strand Bookstore, The Cranbury Bookworm, Troubadour Books, World's Biggest Bookstore

FavoritbibliotekBerkshire Athenaeum, Bodleian Library, Library of Alexandria, New York State Library, The Library of Congress

Om mig "Book collecting is a full-time occupation, and one wouldn't get far if one took time off for frivolities like reading" - A.N.L. Munby

Which, these days, seems to be more than a little true: for the past few months, I seem to have been spending more time cataloging my books and reading the book groups on LT - and now book-swapping - than I have spent actually reading.

- - - - - - - - -

"As you know, Bob..." is one of the traditional ways to refer to the typical clunky exposition found in bad science fiction, when characters turn to each other to patiently explain the obvious. (SEE, for example: Jed Hartman's How I explained infodumps and saved humanity)

I use the name occasionally as a nom de internet, so I might as well use it here on LT, as I've certainly read more than my share of clunky exposition.

I'm a minor civil servant. My partner in this book madness is my wife [MaggieO] (who has a major library of her own); and we have three kids. Our house is now officially Full of books.

(People who visit us are at first staggered by the number of books. Then they usually manage to remark politely, "Welll...errm...I guess you can't HAVE too many books." Uh, no, sorry: we are living proof that you CAN in fact have too many books....)

I have a B.S. in Communication Theory, a reasonably numerate branch of the social sciences. (I washed out of Physics because I'm only reasonably numerate.) While beating my head against upper-division physics courses, I somehow picked up three minors - in Philosophy, in History, and in something called "The Human Dimensions of Science and Technology."

Our friends also tend to be fairly high-powered nerds; between myself, my wife, and our friends, we're interested in a wide swath of human activities, from flint-knapping and (fiber) spinning to nanotechnology and astronomy. You can of course get the gist of our interests from our tags.

E.g.: see the above photo of the 2004 transit of Venus: I made it myself, with some not-so-simple tools found around the house. Note that the photo is of an earth-sized planet half-way between us and our star: our entire planet set against the sun would be about half the size of that black dot. The photo serves as a reminder to keep things in perspective.)

Om mitt bibliotek No, I have NOT read everything here. (I've read more of it than you might think, though.) I custom-built a couple hundred feet of bookshelves for our family room. Yes, we have now officially run out of shelves (we've been forced to resort to the barbarity of double-shelving (*Gasp!* The horror!), and - until the kids leave the nest - we've just about run out of wallspace to put bookshelves. Consequently, some of the older/rattier/less-referred-to stuff has Gone to Storage.)

We are gradually coming around to the strategy of building a library put forth by Samuel Pepys: "For every book that comes into the house, a book will have to leave the house."

{Diaries February 4, 1668: I all day at home, and all morning setting my books in order in my presses for the fallowing year, their number being much increased since the last, so I am fain to lay by several books to make room for better, being resolved to keep no more then just my presses will contain.}

Right now, I'm using LT as a catalog of my BOOKS. I know that a "library" can include more than just books, but that's not how I think of LT.

For about a year, I seemed to have had the largest library of books on LT. This of course was temporary - in the real word, I know a guy who has about 40,000 books, and I'm sure there are plenty more out there.

I have a huge collection of SF, but my non-SF collection is a respectable library all by itself. If we're keeping count, I also have several thousand CDs, several thousand LPs, and probably 4,000? science fiction magazines. I have not yet included these in my LT catalog, although if I ever get some sort of hand-held LT-reader, that may change. (How is "porting LT to the iPod" going?)

Some highlights of my SF collection: I have all of the "Ace Science Fiction Specials" (all three series); (Somewhat surprisingly, this seems to be the only complete set on LT, even after two years here.) I think I have all of the Ace (and Tor...) SF "Doubles"; I have most of the DAW Books (all of them through #1,000). I have every "Year's Best SF" collection that I've been able to find (well over two hundred of them...).

It's said that "the Golden Age of science fiction is 'twelve'". Which is certainly correct in my case - I had been reading the stuff as soon as I could read, but discovering the Wollheim/Carr World's Best Science Fiction anthology when I was, yes, twelve, made my head explode. I've been hooked ever since.

So I seem to be strongest on the SF of the late '60s and then the 1970s - all the stuff that I read as a kid. (E.g.: I bought DAW #1 as a teenager, when I first spotted it in my local store.) As the field has grown, I've made relatively less effort to keep up.

There are some notable gaps for a major SF collection: no Rowling - those are the kids'. No Gaiman or Pratchett or Doug Adams, either - those are either my wife's, or the kids'. The magical-realists are under-represented, simply because they aren't to my taste. "Fantasy" is over-represented (for my taste), largely because for a couple of decades I was a DAW completist. (I'm better now.)

Some thoughts on taxonomy:
For a decade or so, I've kept a catalog of my SF (after a few thousand volumes, I could no longer remember just what I owned, and increasingly found myself accidently buying duplicates). "Tagging" my books has forced me to sit down and think through the taxonomy. My "SF" tag includes not only "speculative fiction", but all sorts of associational stuff: lit crit, biographies and memoirs of sf writers, poetry by Leonard Nimoy, horror by Ambrose Bierce, mainstream novels by PKD, writing guides, etc. So under my 'SF' tag, I place several major subdivisions: I have a couple hundred titles that are "non-fiction about the SF field" ("sf nf"); and the fiction proper is now somewhat arbitrarily divided into "science fiction" and "fantasy". Poul Anderson's Tau Zero is clearly "science fiction", Tolkien's The Hobbit is clearly "fantasy"; but in between, the border between SF and F is of course a question of taste. (Are the "Darkover" books SF or F?). So, each of my 6,000-odd {oops, now 7,000-odd} "SF" books now gets (at minimum) two tags.
I'm going back through to tag some information that applies only to the book-in-my-collection (and not to the work) - where and when I bought it, where I keep it, etc. Sorry if this personal info distracts from the 'tag cloud' for any particular book.

(One reason I immediately joined LT is because Tim used the word "folksonomies" in a sentence. Clearly, I belong here.)

My library is large enough that there really ARE books that I've forgotten I own. One of the pleasures of signing up for LT has been reacquainting myself with books on my shelves that I have not opened in decades.

I find the social aspect of LT to be endlessly fascinating - book lovers are certainly an interesting bunch of people.

Hemsidahttp://asyouknowbob.blogspot.com/

Också påFlickr, LiveJournal, MetaFilter, Slashdot

Medlemsskap LibraryThing Förtids-recensenter

Riktigt namnBob

Plats12345

E-postasyouknowbobaol.com

Kontotypoffentlig, livstid

AnknytningsnyheterAnknytningsnyheter

URL:er http://www.librarything.com/profile/AsYouKnow_Bob (profil)
http://www.librarything.com/catalog/AsYouKnow_Bob (bibliotek)

Medlem sedanJul 2, 2006

Lämna en kommentar

For about a year, I seem to have had the largest library of books on LT.

Well, actually, I still view yours that way. There are four on Zeitgeist that show larger:

* I believe Tim has already posted that one is not a real library, but the result of an application gone wild.
* Anyone with a private library could have 20,000 copies of invented books, ruling out two ahead of you.
* The last says in their comments that they own only about 5000 of the books listed, while you seem to own all.

Congrats!
*smile*
I know I've used a similar argument to the Cartwright (or at least I assume I have) before, mainly when dealing with subjects like canon-inclusion (ie. a map is a map primarily by virtue of what it excludes). It'd definitely be a book that I'd be interested in checking out. Can one view scientific modeling as a form of narrative technique? What would you recommend as a solid POS book?

As for looking at the world and seeing oneself, I've done enough dramamine (see #14) to be wary of pointing fingers at others...
Oh
My
God.
Any thoughts on this? That's a pretty interesting Nin quote from a few days back... I'm reminded of a quote from Escher that came with one of those T-shirts I bought back in HS. It was the metal sphere print. Escher's comment was that no matter what angle we looked at it from, invariably we saw only ourselves.
hey -- it was my impression that SSB was the better title, but i was thrown when i saw GSSB as the majority title in LT. you were a holder, and i figured you would be one of the best people to ask about this! sad to hear about rosel george brown.

i've added the canonical title.

btw -- it won't satisfy your collecting need, but if you want to *read* the book before you find it, i've got it. < g >

cheers,

laura
Hi -- Query; do you have an opinion about whether [[Galactic Sibyl Sue Blue]] or [[Sibyl Sue Blue]] is the better canonical title?
I'm there under the same name - Ian Sales (UK).
I notice the HA image of the Sun on your profile. Are you by chance an astronomer?

Cheers,
Richard
Quote of the day:

"We see things, not as they are, but as we are."

- Anais Nin
Hi, Bob. Will we see you and the family at the BBQ?
"As the court is no doubt aware, Defendant has a virtual monopoly of manufacture and the sale of goods required by Mr. Coyote's work. It is our contention that Defendant has used its market advantage to the detriment of the consumer of such specialized products as itching powder, giant kites, Burmese tiger traps, anvils, and two-hundred-foot-long rubber bands." hee hee hee

"Sheer unadulterated brillance!"
Universality classes easily trump cellular automata when it comes to profundity. Buchanan's Ubiquity was a decent layman's introduction to them.
I only plowed a short way into Wolfram's book before concluding there wasn't going to be much payoff from it. Beautiful-looking book it is though. ;-) I'll hang on it to it, as it is pretty certain to become an infamous instance of the extremes of intellectual vanity.
Thanks - I appreciate it. :) And I'll do my best.

Hope you're both well (and reasonably dry).
For the Divine Marquis and the sans-culottes!

(Now, if I were ever tempted to form a band...)
Happy Independence, Bob!

If you're having a party, I hope the soundtrack is worthy... :)
P.S.

pop trash

We'll see how your esteemed friendship holds up when I start entering mine. Two words: cabaret, ukulele. :)
I've seen Tomšič play.

Daaaaaamn! Er, most excellent! :) It's more than I can say... but from the recs, she's really very good (one always feels apologetic when it comes to near-unknowns). Eh, did you catch the circus in the first home page thread? I got a bit excited yesterday.

Music account--GO for it. It's clearly far from perfect (I couldn't decide where to stick catalogue numbers so skipped them entirely--there will be hell to pay once I enter all cca 3-4K recs and have to go back to comments or something for the lot), but I'm not fussy. It'll do. And aren't the CD covers nifty? Googling them can become a bit of an obsession though. Still, I discovered dozens of cool music sites doing that. Bottom line, I'd love more music-catalogue company. Most people didn't bother to separate them from books. Out of curiosity, which way do you lean, pure or mixed catalogue? Can't say I have very well-worked out reasons for separating them, and if collections allow integration, I may meld the two accounts. Then again... it's one thing to have a whole set of music recs called "books", and another to mix them up with actual books.

Let me know your thoughts on this that and other!
Avaland just brought the Hartwell/Cramer from the bookstore. Since we're going to Australia this August, I'm considering waiting, and taking it along then to read.

I guess they must not do ARCs for the best-of-year - usually someone has an ARC by the time one gets one's copy.
Just read this:
=================================
"caveman fiction, that is a good tag! Hope to see that one expand!"

Oh, hi.
Yeah, thanks, me too - that tag occurred to me as I cataloged a couple specimens of the genre. I don't actively read or collect that tag, but long ago I did read a children's "caveman fiction" story that I would not mind finding again. (It's too bad I don't know the title or author.) Maybe if the tag spreads, someday I'll find it.

posted by AsYouKnow_Bob at 11:47 pm (EST) on Jul 14, 2006
=================================
I strongly suspect the book you were thinking of is "Fire Hunter" by Jim Kjelgaard (yes, the guy who wrote the "Big Red", books--though I never read any of those myself. Wasn't interested in dog fiction). But "Fire Hunter" was a great book when I read it in 4th grade. I don't know what I'd think of it now. I notice that it doesn't exist on LT anywhere.
Thanks for welcoming me to the site.
I can die happy now.

Don't you dare. Maggie would have my hide on a toothpick. :)

Yeah, Pankrti are one of the glories of the old YU music scene...
Thank you for the May Day greeting, comrade. May you always overfulfill your quota.
And a very HAPPY MAY DAY to you too!
Glad you checked it out! Great bookstore and yes the sign out front is a real teaser ...
I'll be sure to check out Haidt tomorrow!
Thank you for welcoming me to LibraryThing.
THANK YOU for pointing the 6-word story thread out to me!!! I had a huge brain itch about that one and I couldn't for the life of me find it again (and believe me, I tried!)! And I was so happy with the ones I thought up. ^^ So thank you, thank you, thank you. You definitely did your good deed for the day. :)
Hi Bob,

Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be much action in the Delany group. Perhaps we can change that! Anyway, I am in awe of your library!
Thanks for the welcome to LT. Considering the size of your library and the likelihood that people will find it interesting, much of your time must be taken up welcoming newcomers like myself!

Sincerely, ReneeMarie
Hi, welcome to LibraryThing. (We could use more scientists around here.)
-Bob

Thanks, Bob. I bow to the superior selection and volume of your collection. I look forward to getting lost in your library. --KR
Thanks, Bob. I appreciate the compliment.
Someone else who knows the Librarium Bookstore! Yes!
I see one of your favorite authors is Anonymous. Thank you: it's about time I've been recognized -- and as a favorite at that.

Yrs,

Spunky Brewster
Thanks for the welcome note, Bob. Your "about" sections are excellent reading :)

I'm just starting my cataloging efforts, but since I've moved my bookshelves and left most of their contents on the living room floor, I'm having no trouble finding inspiration to continue the efforts. I was recently pleased to discover that it was possible to include my Analog Science Fiction - Science Fact periodicals. They seem to be uncommonly collected though - I've the only registered copy of most issues. Perhaps I'll have to scan in some covers and do some cleanup once I get all these beasts entered.
Thanks for letting me know about the Zimmer site; I just got my tattoos posted there :).
I've been working on New York State. There are so many libraries ! I've gotten up from the city to Albany County and then played around with Buffalo/Erie area and way up in the Canadian border area.
AYKB: I'm always curious what makes one thingamabrarian find another thingamabrarian's collection interesting. So I came over here and I'm still not sure, unless it's politics of a particularly progressive bent. Was that it?

And, you've got at least one of my novels on your overcrowded shelves. For which, many thanks.
I know I know! And some of my favourites will make other people gag and puke -- which is the way it should be.

But it is quite disturbing that almost every 'cyberpunk' book I've read that I should have absolutely adored... well... hmmm, my grandmother's bowel movement updates are more interesting to me... ugh. That should say a lot.

*snicker*
Bob! So lovely to hear from you! How's everything been? How are you weathering winter?

Thanks ever so for the link, and for the thought! Both tickled me immensely. I just adore the pic!

Hope you're well--

Tavia
If you're interested in cataloging, we're ready to get started on the Benjamin Franklin catalog. You can come on over to the group (Benjamin Franklin's LT Catalog) and check the first two posts in the "Volunteer for Your Section Here" thread to choose the books you want to enter.
Thanks for updating me on the data. The last I read it was statistically similar, but this...

And thanks for the good words.
I'm adding photos of my more obscure books, including one which we share, Mathematics Illustrated Dictionary by Jeanne Bendick. I just love seeing the photos of my books on LT, don't you?
Thanks for the welcome and glad you like the modalursine bit.

By the standards of the LT heavy hitters we have hardly any books at all. My wife and I looked each other one day and simultaneosly said (of our books) "Too many notes, Mozart, too many notes". We havent actually uh "de-accessioned" a whole bunch, but we've been trying to hold the increase down to a dull roar.

Its not obvious so far, because I've only got about 250 which is just maybe 10% or so, wont be sure till the job is done, of our books onto LT ; BUT we are also big Sci Fi addicts.

We may have mentioned that our "master plan" (quit giggling back there!) is for us to retire to Colorado. We spend summers at our Colorado house and winters in Manhattan. Its a "bicoastal" life style that we've been enjoying so far, but figure we wont be able to support once both of us have completely quit having earned income.
I can believe all that about John Zorn. My apartment does have a few more practical contents than his, however. Wow! Everyone who's commented picked up my name right away. I think I'm in the right place.
Isn`t it great ?

It certainly is.

I don`t know if you do Xmas, but Season`s Greetings anyway,

Nick
Hi! I tend to pick up odd issues of magazines when I see them but I'm trying to resist all out collecting of other magazines on the grounds of a)I can't store them and b)I'll never get around to reading them! Though I am tempted to get Galaxy & If/Worlds of If collections...
Hi,

Keep seeing your posts in the Pros and Cons thread, so thought I`d just say hello as we`ve not come accross each other for a while.

How are you keeping ?

As you can imagine, Ann-Marie and I are currently viewing the world through a haze of exhaustion, but are basically very happy indeed. The new arrival is largely a very contented little lad, but can certainly make his presence felt when he wants to !

Nick
Hi Bob

I know, it's funny!

I see you like Joy Division. I collect JD concert bootlegs in a small way, and have about twenty or so. Quality varies wildly. I note you catalogue music on LT too. I'm intrigued, but part of me really doesn't want to know how you do it, as I have around 5K albums...

I have reserved the sfcollectorseditions.blogspot url, which indicates to me that my subconscious is gearing up for another book binge. Many of the editions I have found seem pretty cheap, but one or two are hideously expensive, which is putting me off somewhat.

In light of the sheer number of books you have, when you say you 'like' Penguin Classics, I envisage that you have about 400 of them!

Regards, Andrew
note to myself:

foreign-born population:
http://www.census.gov/population/www/doc...

15% at 1900. decline from 1930 until ca. 1970, waxing since then.

(googling for 'recent-immigration-by-year' mostly turns up a bunch of RW trash - a freeper link is hit #2)
Thanks for the tip-off re. the Gollancz list. By an eerie quirk of fate, it appears that our other halves have eerily similar interests. Who would have guessed?
Oh, duh, I already have you in my contacts at flickr. Clearly I need to spend more time browsing on flickr!
We need an "also on" category for Making Light :)

Say, I see you're on flickr as well, I'll go check out your pix!
I am in awe of your book collection. Just. Wow. Given my current living space, I would have to be very creative with storage to make room for that many books but I would love to have them.
From my vague memories pretty sure I saw it in a library once. Now, I have a mooched version. :)
Hi, Bob. Always good to hear from someone so knowledgeable!
[Red Shift] is one of those books I keep recommending to other people - but it takes real effort on the part of the reader to understand and appreciate it. I can count on my thumbs the number of co-enthusiasts I've met ... and that includes you!

Have you seen The Unofficial Alan Garner Website, by the way? It has some wonderful interviews and articles; the one by Charles Butler called "Red Shift and the Shifting Ballad of 'Tam Lin'" is particularly worth a read.

Incidentally, I was going to recommend to you a video I found on YouTube called "Barthomley and Mow Cop"; effectively a slideshow of photographs taken by a local, and set (disconcertingly) to the tune of "The Old Rugged Cross"! However, it's since been removed by the owner - no idea why. As it happens, when I lived in England a few years back, I made a side trip to Barthomley (couldn't manage Mow Cop). St. Bertoline's Church is exactly as it's described; I kept expecting Jan and Tom to come in the door and examine the rood screen or "that dead her" (= Lady Houghton's memorial, just as lifelike as described in the book - the locals like to put flowers on her marble from time to time). Who knows, given the fluidity of time in [Red Shift], perhaps Jan and Tom were there, I just couldn't see them...
Cool, may as well get it. I think what Bauer did was novelise the scripts from what a website says, but anyway, if it is local, may as well grab it.

Well spotted, didn't even tihnk of there, being in more of a find the contents thought mode.
When I looked him up a few days ago Bauer is a poet/academic with a novel - Satyrday.
Confusing - there is a volume I by someone else? Do you remember who? That might be the one I am after perhaps then.
Ah, from that link seems like there is actually 2 of them, and that one doesn't look familiar, so must have been the first one.
Thanks. So that is one of the ones that it is a bit scary to get to at your place then? :)
P.S. I used to review books for Metroland. They let me sneak a science fiction title in there every second or third book. ;-)
Ahh, that makes sense (sf for spec fic, I mean).

Funny you should pick Tau Zero as an example; it's one of the top three most important/influential books in my life. The other two are The Songs of Distant Earth by Clarke (not considered one of his better books, but I differ on that) and A Tree Grows in Brooklyn.

So I bet we've been at the same Albacon before. We lived in Waterford 1996 to the end of 2002, and got to at least three Albacons in that time period. We were planning on coming for World Fantasy in Saratoga Springs this year, but I changed jobs and have not yet accrued vacation yet.

Perhaps we'll cross paths somewhere down the line!
Ack! You aren't who I thought you were -- someone in one of my in-person book groups here in Houston.

But I lived in upstate NY just before we moved here.... Waterford, near Albany. My husband went to RPI and I worked at PEF. We went to Albacon several years; do you go to that?

Anyhow, thanks for the answer on Artifact by Benford. That was the quickest I've had a book mystery solved, I think!

I'm curious, what is the difference between your sf tag and your science fiction tag, if you don't mind my asking?
International Cephalopod Awareness Day

I wasn't aware!

Hi, Bob, I just got back from a very unrestful vacation... Altho', I was a Woman Who Swims With the Squid for a while... :)
Regarding your comment: "We are gradually coming around to the strategy of building a library put forth by Samuel Pepys: 'For every book that comes into the house, a book will have to leave the house.'"

You're lucky that Pepys didn't specify "for X new pages coming in, X old pages have to leave." That means for any book coming in you can launch some skinny little item into the abyss. Maybe you'll want to stock up on a shelf of skinny little things before the Pepysian Rule becomes mandatory, so that you have a stockpile of ejectables. Oh, wait, you'd still be in the shelf space crunch, wouldn't you?

Never mind.
I did like your recent posting in the Rare, Old & Offbeat group ! Very entertaining.

Here in Hoonaloon land things are going well, and the new arrival is expected early November.

For all the difficulties of running our own business, I think it will be good when that time comes that we`ll both be around so much to enjoy the experience, much better than in my own father`s day, when he actually didn`t see that much of my early years due to working long hours.

Living in Derbyshire is also appealing, after a very rough start, and things are settling down nicely now.

How are things with you ? Say `Hi` to Maggie for us.

Best,

Nick & Ann-Marie
AYKB,

Thanks indirectly for the "Birdland" link. I also associated SilentInAWay to InASilentWay. Another also for associating Joe primarily with "Mercy, Mercy, Mercy." RIP.
Thanks much for the YouTube link. Believe it or not, my daughter (who is a jazz drummer) has taken periodic lessons with Peter Erskine since she was eight (she's eighteen now). We last saw him about a month ago. I sent him a short message and included the YouTube link you sent me. Thanks again.
Thanks for letting me know about Zawinul--I hadn't heard. I saw him perform twice, nearly 30 years apart--both times, curiously, at the Hollywood Bowl: with Weather Report at the first Playboy Jazz Festival back in the 70s and with the Zawinul Syndicate just a few years ago. Funny, despite all his innovative work with Miles in the late sixties and WR in the seventies, the song that first comes to mind when I think of Joe Zawinul is "Mercy, Mercy, Mercy" (which he wrote when he was playing with Cannonball--before my time, in fact). Thanks again for letting me know.
Hey there- we met at Readercon and I just wanted to say hello and thanks for the info on LT...lovely place here, think I'm going to stay. :-) I'd thank your fellow-panelists, but I've forgotten everyone's usernames. Apologies for my lousy grammar, I'm running a bit of a fever.
In your review of Robert Charles Wilson's Spin, you say "I spotted a bug in the premise that dampened my enjoyment of this one."

I read it, and can't think of what the bug might be. I do catch a great many such bugs in the sf I read, actually in nearly all, though I usually can enjoy the story anyway. What's the problem?
That is fantastic collection Bob, maybe I can get to that level one day : D Particularly admirable Chomsky collection.
I think Mike ford's 110 Stories is as great a poem or greater than Paul Celan's Death Fugue about the Holocaust. You are fortunate to have had the privilege of meeting him. I can't thank you enough for introducing me to him. Would you have any objection to my posting the poem in Poetry Fool? They are folks who appreciate poetry. His footnote said it could be copied for personal use. What do you think?
Thank you for introducing me to the poetry of Mike Ford. The world trade center poem is magnificent. How did you find out about him?
Thanks for sharing this with us :o)
Hello Bob, Yes, I surmised you being an INTP. Your explanation of your library and yourself is so...how do I say...thorough! I understand that NTs and NFs get on well together. My best friend at BGSU who is my colleague in the English Department is an INTP. What a great wit she has. Glad to have you as my "friend."
Yes, it seems that many people haven't picked favorites. LTer "oakesspaulding" has over 30 KA books in his library, and several reviews, but hasn't named any favorites yet.
Well, we don't see eye to eye on most things, but since you and I are two of the only three LT-ers to list Kingsley Amis as a favorite author, you can't be all bad. ;-)
Happy to bring the book. Hope you like it
I won't leave another message unless I can address yourself as Mr President... ;-) F
Hello Bob,

>patron of civil servants: Yes I noted this afterwards in your profile. It's rather logical. Do you intend to rise in the pecking order as He did?

François
Cheers for messages - will `reply better` in due course - have been moving furniture all afternoon and too tired to be grammatical !

Best,

Nick
Pepys and SciFi? Why not? I suggest that what you describe as your nom de internet should rather read nom d'internet in French—although I never saw this neologism of yours here in France. Perhaps a subtler French flavour would be nom de toile, a toile being a web, and la toile being often used here to avoid the English form le net... ;-)

But how do you do with so many books?
Thanks for the welcome message and the invitation to join the Ace Doubles group, which I have. Looks like I'm not the only one wondering how best to post the doubles. Guess I'll use the "post-it-now-and-change-it-later" approach for the time being.

Finding a web site like this is akin to "coming home again" for anyone who loves books and reading.

LOL!...After reading some of the many comments directed your way, I'd have to say you "lead an interesting life." Best to you,

--Murray in Colorado
I`ve just been pruning some of the old messages on my profile page and realised how long it is since we were in touch.

Since we moved house we`ve had quite a lot to contend with - the house turned out to be more neglected than we realised and our relatively small budget for improvements was soon eaten up, also the business has needed constant atention to keep it afloat. Plus, I must admit, I can only spend so much time on the computer before I long to be outdoors - this is much more pronounced now we can see Derbyshire countryside from the back windows of our house.

We`re actually finding some time to relax now and I`m getting a bit of reading done - currently making my second attempt on David Levering Lewis` Du Bois biography.

Anyway, we moved, we saw, we conquered and all OK now, plus we`re expecting our first child in November ! You can be the first LTer to hear about it.

Hope you are well, regards to Maggie.

Nick & Ann-Marie
Gracias Bob! In light of the fact that I saw your use of the word in a discussion of the taxonomy of your tags, it makes perfect sense. I wasn't sure if it could just be used euphemistically with Sci Fi and Fantasy or was a whole other ball of wax: your description made it quite clear.

Thanks for responding to my comment-
Twa Corbies
Hi Bob,

I popped over to your profile because of the Talk discussion about cool profiles (it is quite nice, by the way). When you were discussing your tags, you mention "speculative fiction." I was wondering if you consider it a term interchangeable with Sci Fi and Fantasy or something quite specific or even a sub genre. I was reading "Darker Than You Think" before work at a cafe and noticed one of the blurbs mentioned something like "a remarkable work of Speculative Fiction." I'm sure some could cynically compare it to the use of "Graphic Novel" in place of Trade Paperback Comic Book (or whatever), but since your library and experience with Sci Fi seems vast, I thought you would have an interesting answer (my own experience is quite small- the only thing Sci Fi I've read in my adult years that I can think of is "The Stars My Destination" so you can take my lack of knowledge on the subject as a given).

Anyway, if you get a chance, I'd love to hear your thoughts on it. In any case, great profile page- the lot of you on the Talk thread have inspired me to do a bit more work on my own!

Thanks,
twacorbies (Sean)
Ah oui, JACQUES!

Vive la liberté, égalité, fraternité!
Thanks very much, Bob. :)
Yeah, I knew you were off adding to your book collection. Certainly no rush at all, just wondering.

Thanks :)
The Gerald Page Heroic Fantasy anthology I haven't seen a contents for online anywhere.

If that is handy in the Measureless Caverns of books sometime in the future I'd be interested, in knowing what is in it.

DAW 334 I think, if you have all those organised.

Thanks,

bt
Hello from another Capital Region book collector and fellow SF and fantasy addict.
Yeah, that is a good point, I guess a question for a publisher to be asked there, if they would even tell you. The ones I have were generally presents or remaindered (and may have been both). so 'gift-buyers' may make up some number of that?
Thanks for your kind comments about the site AsYouKnow_Bob, I look forward to talking to you on the forums, if you decide to join. Thanks, Greg
Hi, I noticed a few chess titles in your catalog and thought you might like to check my forum site out- www.ChessForums.org, we have a dedicated section to chess books and recommended reading you may be interested in, thanks, Greg
Yes, I have Myths For the Modern Age, thanks. A great book. One I actually bought new as soon as I found out about it pretty much. :)

He is also working on a reference work, the URL below will give you an idea. Myths has a great John Picacio cover too with a fab Modesty Blaise as part of it.

http://www.pjfarmer.com/woldnewton/Chron...
Hi,
Thanks for your post on my question about the Readercon. *Love* your library! I live in a small apt , so I have to do the Samuel Pepys order as well. I hope to see you an your family at the Readercon. I'm doin a bit of volunteering, so you'll most likely find at registration the first day or so.
All the best, Kris
Thanks for responding to my post, Bob. I also wanted to mention that I appreciated your comment on which writers are your favorites, and which ones you leave to the kids:

"no Rowling - those are the kids'. No Gaiman or Pratchett or Doug Adams, either - those are either my wife's, or the kids'."

Those are also the writers my own kids enjoy, and that I have not always been as drawn to, but I have enjoyed the sharing as we pass books back and forth. I have learned to appreciate Gaiman, and they also introduced me to Neal Stepehnson, whom I thoroughly enjoy. I started them on Orson Scott Card (whose Ender's Game I would teach if I ever had a Middle School English class again), and they read him more voraciously than I ever did. I also shared Philip K. Dick to general acclaim. They passed on their graphic novels (and I have really enjoyed both Y:The Last Man and Finder: Sin Eater by Carla Speed McNeil), and I passed on mine (Maus), much-loved by all of us. They gave me Godel, Escher and Bach, too, which is waaay over my head, but fascinating as an afternoon snack. Very nice to connect with one's kids in this way!

Yes, had I read Dhalgren in my youth I am sure I would have enjoyed it more -- it was a world I partially inhabited then and only remember with some surprise today. But the challenge of the read was quite pleasurable even now -- it kept those creaky brain cells stimulated.
Gosh, I totally missed that. I usually check delong daily, but my net was down for 3 weeks. I saw your handle on one the comments, and it hit me that I saw it regularly, but sometimes in a different context.
Hi fellow ML'er! I friended you over at LJ, too.
Ha! I can respect that.
Hi. Took me a while to make the connection. Small virtual world.
Bob:

We likely agree on very little and would probably get into it on a variety of subjects, ideologies and points of view. Nonetheless, I respect your right to disagree with me vociferously and hope you will continue to defend your way of thinking with articulateness and grace. I remain willing to be persuaded and to change my mind if I'm wrong. Otherwise, I'd be a dunderhead and an arsehole.
You're welcome. No, you haven't, but be assured the opinion is mutual. Have a great evening. :)

~M~
Dear Bob,

Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig.

~M~
Hi, Bob. I just had to check in here because the Red Room AYK_Bob fangirls had so many nice things to say about you (as I imagine MaggieO has told you). Your library is amazing. I loved sci fi when I was a kid, and read it voratiously up until my mid-20's. Then returned for a one-year obsessive period when my third child was born. Like you, I prefer sci-fi to fantasy, and I like my sci-fi a little heavy on the sci, not because it is my field but because it is intriguing to me. Almost all my sci-fi books are gone now (too much moving around), but I was pleased to see you are a SR Delaney fan -- I just read Dhalgren (see my review), but found little on LT about it. Had hoped to chat with others who have read it. I have ordered his autobiography and hope to pursue Delaney further. Oh, and love your handle!
"OK, that went far enough toward an apology that we're speaking again."

Hmmm, I hadn't actually realized we had stopped speaking. I must not have received everything you've been writing to me since last December before you cut me off! Anyway, I'm so glad we've now finally got that mix-up sorted out. :)

Addressing your last point first ...

"My refutation of point "c" remains: Good writing is good writing, we recognize it when we see it, and it sometimes occurs even in the genre ghetto of SF. Because good writing can appear anywhere, even in a genre as 'low-brow' as, oh, say, golf stories in WWI-era copies of Redbook."

In 1910 Wodehouse wasn't considered "classic literature" or even "literary"; because very few people knew of his existence back then. His popularity clearly changed as he entered his purple prose period (let's say 1920 through the 60s) and it progressively increased throughout that period. However, he was still not considered "classic literature" in 1920 (just after the Redbook period you mentioned), nor was he considered that in 1930, 1940, 1950 ... 2000, or even today. But I do believe he may be getting there ... each generation he progresses further up the literary squash ladder, as it were. But one isn't generally acknowledged as being a literary master over night, any more than you go straight to the top of the squash ladder the day you join a new racquets club, even if you are the best player in the club the day that you join. You have to demonstrate that superior skill set to a fresh opponent (read each new batch of literary critics for the analogue) at each rung of the ladder.

Plum's writing was almost fully matured by the WW1 period you referenced, and by the early twenties he had definitely hit his stride - The Awakening of Rollo Podmarsh (which appeared in Redbook in 1923? I believe) is, IMHO, one of the funnier and best written pieces that he created. In fact, all of the golf stories in The Heart of a Goof appeared in Redbook that year or thereabouts. And yes, his writing then was definitely "good writing" - regardless of whether anyone labeled it as such then, or even labels it that way now. Because, I too, recognize it when I see it. However, that quality assessment is only from my OWN PERSONAL PERSPECTIVE. Just like the Supreme Court, I also recognize pornography when I see it! :)

If Plum remained a literary outsider, or was even considered absolute rubbish by the literati crowd, as long as he is still popular enough to remain in print such that I am able to currently read him I would be quite content. Yet it is so much nicer for my own ego, isn't it, if I also know that my own personal favorite author is well respected in all the best corridors of literature, and that my own choice of reading material is vindicated by people possibly much smarter than me, better qualified academically than me, and possibly even with provably better taste than me, too? And isn't that what parts of that sci-fi thread were really all about (at least in those places where the actual OP topic was forgotten)?

****************

BTW, you loaded your last argument there with quite a bit of hyperbole, IMO. "Because good writing can appear anywhere, even in a genre as 'low-brow' as, oh, say, golf stories in WWI-era copies of Redbook." I am personally not acquainted with the status and quality of the Redbook publication - unlike, say, The Saturday Evening Post or Playboy magazines, I have never actually seen one. But even if I accept that that particular publication normally churned out abysmal, lowest of the low-brow pap, the fact is, each of those golf stories were published in the Strand magazine in London about two months prior to their appearing in publication on this side of the pond in Redbook. So however much you may claim that those Plum stories were pearls hidden amongst a bunch of crap from, say, other areas of the genre ghetto(s), over in London Plum was being published in what was considered to be the best magazine in its class - one in fact that he had read assiduously as a child when one of his own literary heroes, Arthur Conan Doyle, was still publishing Sherlock Holmes short stories in it.

So Plum's writing had clearly already been recognized sufficiently in Britain for it to be published cheek-by-jowl with the best other top commercial-selling authors of the day. Now I fully realize that "top-selling" doesn't equate to "literary", nevertheless the situation is also far from being the "hidden bright spot in a dismal genre ghetto" scenario that you just tried to paint. Good writing may indeed occur within the genre ghetto of SF - for instance, I think Vonnegut would obviously fulfil that description, but no one on that thread knew enough to mention him - but IMO Plum's stories (or at least the Redbook era ones that you specifically referenced) are simply not very good examples of some of that kind of writing.

Later.
Hi Bob,

I really have no idea why you found my post "borderline offensive" but hopefully I addressed your concerns somewhat with my response. However, having just reread that second post I now realize that it may contain something that could well be misconstrued due to my poor sentence structure. At the end I wasn't calling you a numpty; only the people that have previously flagged other innocuous posts of mine. I probably need to go back and remove that comment.

The problem with aesthetics is that it's such a thorny discipline. If you insist that there is an aesthetic in whichever field of endeavor you're addressing - art, music, literature, or even just the sci-fi genre thereof - then someone is bound to call you an elitist and a snob. If you acknowledge that all tastes are somewhat valid then you've just destroyed the concept of their being an aesthetic hierarchy (i.e., good all the way through bad, by whatever value system you choose to use in order to determine that progression). Finally, if you try and take the middle ground between these two extremes (as I think you were doing), in the end all your arguments will end up sounding like something that is straight out of Orwell ... all tastes are equally valid but some are more tasteful than others!

So you can choose to be an elitist snob (in the eyes of others), or you can adopt the skeptical viewpoint that you cannot discern between different values (what I was calling intellectual nihilism), or you can try and walk the middle ground and end up sounding like a hypocrite! Elitism, nihilism, hypocrisy ... not a pretty choice! I never enjoyed aesthetics. :( Of the three, I prefer to be an elitist simply because I don't want to be a nihilist or a hypocrite.

I think that Warhol and Duchamp pretty well destroyed the elitist position in art (if Brillo pads and urinals are art, what isn't art?) which might be one of the reasons why nihilism is now so prominent in post-modernist thinking. Anyway, I'm sorry you thought I was trying to put words in your mouth ... I really wasn't ... it's just the nature of the beast. To my mind, aesthetics is just one big slippery slope. Personally, I prefer not to think about it too much and read Plum instead! :(

Take care.
Hi,

I've only listed 68 books so far - 11 of them non-fiction - and we share 50 of them, so I naturally admire your taste!

The SF and warships groups look interesting - I'll have to join those.

Tony Williams
Hello again

Thanks for the heads up on the Utica group, nice of you to think of me. I took a peek, it looks like she wants to begin a reading group and as you suspected, Utica is a bit too far for me to drive for that. Thanks though:)
hi

thanks for offering to help me get the utica ny book lovers grp goin
nice profile
Bob:

I'm gobsmacked. Thanks for the info on the author site...and Inman. The book has been of interest to me for years, one of those niggling titles that you can never really get out of your head. The only thing comparable was this short sports novel called THE ONLY GAME IN TOWN a friend gave me when I was in Grade 7. Only problem was, the last five pages were missing so I never knew how it ended. A couple of years ago, thanks to abebooks.com, I found the book super-cheap and read the conclusion. A mystery stretching back 25 years solved. Doncha love when that happens? I'll follow up your tips in the a.m. I'm a bit tired and 50 pages into the new Lee Child "Jack Reacher" novel. I find the series bloody addictive. Reacher solves the crime and viciously exacts punishment on wrong-doers. Often with fatal consequences. That gibes well with my northern Irish genes, methinks. Be well--undoubtedly there will be further contact between us.
Bob:

Having trouble paring down the "LT Author" site you alluded to. Is there somewhere specific you have in mind? I'm getting something like 60 entries...keep in mind I'm a technological moron and make the appropriate adjustment in terminology/approach.
C.B.
Bob:

Thanks for the invite and I'm intrigued that of all the people in LT I think I have the most books in common
with you. I appreciate your modesty (describing yourself as a "minor civil servant"). No inflated egos there. I shall have a look at the group you mentioned and hope I fare better there than with the SF fandom crowd. I envy your collection and have a feeling that if I dropped by to browse your collection you'd have to get rid of me with mace and a Taser.

Regards to you,

Cliff
wow. just wow.

You have a VERY impressive collection here.
I guess that makes me just another admirer of your library. *chuckle*

Although, by the looks of things, and after reviewing the number of books we share (167 works, 197 books) I'm not really that surprised that so many eventually wander into the corners of your library to gaze at, wander around and hopelessly stare at the collection you have amassed here. Will Durant in common, very nice. :)

Anyways, just rambling about and thought I would throw a smile/comment your way.

Much bliss & happy reading! :)
~PandorasRequiem
Speaking of Merrill, some of those older types with locals in 'em :-

Harry Harrison

1967 : The Left Hand Way - A. Bertram Chandler

Judith Merrill

07 : Parky - David Rome
08 : Change of Heart - A. Bertram Chandler
10 : It Could Be You - Frank Roberts
11 : There's A Starman in Ward 7 - David Rome
Hello A.Y.K_Bob,

Thank you for the welcome - some people are lumpers/some people are splitters - I'm a lumper is all.

I am very excited about this site - I have been looking for something like this for years and have contemplated actually, in the past, buying software to do the job. (Usually when I get home from the library booksale and find I have bought another duplicate...)

I imagine that I will run into you a few times - you have 58 of the 75 books I have entered - and I have only put in my Heinlein and one shelf of anthologies!

Thanks again for the welcome.

PortiaLong
Heh. I probably wouldn't have favorited some writers if I'd discovered the function later and found dozens of names already there, but how could I resist being the first person to favorite Wodehouse? I went to my author cloud and just skimmed down thinking "favorite... not favorite... not favorite... not favorite... favorite..." It's a surprisingly easy distinction to make; for some reason there are lots of authors I read happily, even consider "great," but do not classify as favorites.

Even though I have less than half as many books as you, I too have to double-shelve and keep finding books that escaped the first cataloguing. One side benefit is that I discover (after years or decades of ownership) that two or more books that I kept in completely separate mental drawers were written/edited by the same person! Another benefit is that people can finally dare to give me books as gifts, since they can easily find out whether I already have them.
Hi Bob

Thanks for the welcome!

It's always nice to come across another Keith Roberts fan--in fact it's always nice to come across someone else who has heard of Keith, it amazes me that a writer so good can be so little known, but then I suppose the the old "lowest common denominator" rule comes into play, and that means the best known and the most liked of anything, books, music, movies, is . . . . um....ordure!
FYI, I found a pretty good copy of Michael Harrington's Socialism....I'll eventually get around to reading it......mamachunk
Hi there, had you seen
this thread on least favourite works by Card?. Some interesting discussion to read, at least for me, in finding others who liked some of the works but really disliked some of his other opinions. I remembered your previous comment on the throwing a book across a room.
Ok, will do. The SFBC episode is number 10, by the looks. These are only 30-45 minute type episodes, so hasn't taken long to listen.
Thanks for the books, found this today :-

http://adventuresinscifipublishing.blogs...

May be of interest, there is a SF book club editor one in the middle episodes.

Also saw Dozois has a Best of the Year's Best book out too, while browsing ABE. Lol.
Yes, we wait patiently for MagazineThing also...for dukedom's sake since all of the genre magazines are his. Might you break down and catalog them anyway and tag them magazine? I'd be tempted to do ours but I'm concerned about a common format. Couldn't Tim just add a new tab at the top..."add zines" that would bring up a form? I've noticed some users are cataloguing cominc books (not graphic novels but actual comic books...).

I do believe someone was asking about $50 for that issue of Interzone. I wondered if Angela Carter might have been the British equivalent of our John Crowley within the genre. You know? Not in writing style, but in their relationship to the genre.

Dealer list is up on the Readercon website now. Start saving your pennies:-) Best, Lois
Yeah, there is a locust like plague of 'em. I don't think I knew about that one, either, or the Betancourt horror version.

To collect them if they keep going at this rate you would need a titanium reinforced bookcase (and probably floor) as they ain't small.
I also saw this, these suckers are proliferating like mushrooms, guess they must be selling nicely.

http://www.yearsbestsf.info/

Population of world much bigger than in DAW's day, so should be able to fill a few more books I guess. :)
Doesn't matter, found 'em at a more obscure source.

http://www.bestsf.net/reviews/wollheim19...
When it said review, I figured that is what it was, not a story list!
Hi Bob, while I had been browsing the Australian thing, I forgot about Wollheim. You have the 1990 World's Best - any in that? Haven't seen a contents online (locus, etc.) for that one, or for 1989 if you have that one hidden away anywhere, either.

I think the 1979 has Creator by David Lake, which is in one of Paul Collins' anthologies here, but not one I have found at other than very keen collector prices.
So he may be the earliest local in one of those.

Thanks,

bt
"Any sufficiently advanced technology becomes a Greg Egan story."
-- Clarke's Fourth Law.
(I don't see why Arthur should be the only Clarke who gets to formulate them.)
-- Paul Clarke, rec.arts.sf.written
I met a guy once whose house was filled like that with old computers and teletypes. He did have a fridge, sink, and one place setting at the table that wasn't covered with machines. My husband bought an old teletype from him and hooked it up to monitor our furnace, using the house wiring for communication and a breadboarded microcomputer (the only way to get one in the '70s).

PZ rocks!

Highly recommended: "Evolution" by Carl Zimmer.
Thanks for the book/s breakdown - now that I know what's in them, won't buy them. Like you I have read/have most of the stories already. Also agree with you about Card.. I absolutely loved Ender's Game, and some of his short story work.. but _absolutely_ disagree with other viewpoints he holds which 'taint' his other work for me.
Thanks again and have fun with the shelf checking.
Cheers, any fix helps. There's a few people keeping an eye on them now..see the combiners group discussion for how some editions have got isbn's from OTHER editions in their data. That makes it even harder. Sigh

On a more positve anthologies note....when you get a moment I'd welcome any opinion on the Brian M Thomsen Novel Ideas anthologies. They look interesting, but would be an import/bookstore order for me to get down here.
Sorry I didn't see your comment to me earlier.
Thanks, but I thought I'd stopped too, and keep telling myself "no more - look away, look away" and then one little thing leads to another... There are much better discussions around on LT so I'm going to try to stick to those.

I like some of you blog entries. Particularly the home ownership analysis.

And I'm not so keen on SF, but I notice we have a lot of other books in common. The question of tagging is an interesting one, though the divisions for me were slightly different - I puzzled over the divisions between national/language-bound literatures and settled on an inadequate compromise, but I did go over some of the points in detail on a thread started by LolaWalser. I'll dig it up if you're interested.
I like your little theory enough to want to appropriate it for myself. :)

I've started reading your blog too - interesting. See you around!
Hi again Bob -- How right you were about those ridiculous arguments about poverty. Folks definitely aren't interested in considering further than their pre-conceived notions. The 'inanity' comment was apt. :-)
Seems your favorite mind-melter man has a new one coming?

http://gregegan.customer.netspace.net.au...
Right, there is that one. Possible the odd story from that is online too. I guess I don't think anthology when I think of that, but that would work.

I will look at the Bookmooch list, but there is the whole tyranny of distance/postage! :)
I finally did a mind melter tag. Off the top of my head, anyway. :)
Bob, I'm impressed with the Ace Double collection. I hope you don't mind, but I posted the photo along with a link to your Flickr page on my blog, at http://stevensteinbock.blogspot.com/. I don't have a whole lot of Aces. My collection is heavier on crime/detective fiction than sf, so I have a lot of Dells, Avon, PocketBooks, ect.
11-freaking-thousand books owned by you and Maggie -- WOW! I've added you guys to my watch list. You go guys! :-)
Re: Amis. What's the title I have you've never heard of? I'm a bit obsessive, it's true. Sorry, I haven't been checking LibraryThing lately; I just saw your note today.
Hello again!

I saw your post about selling duplicates on ebay. I have a few I'm thinking of selling but I've never done the ebay thing. What were the advantages of ebay over, say Amazon, for you? Any pointers of wisdom you'd be willing to impart?

I keep trying to get through your Bookmooch inventory btw, however, I'm always about 10 pages in when the site becomes ungodly sloooooow. Probably just as well since I could blow all my measly few points and not get through half your offerings.
Kaeti And Company - I know, vastly undervalued in my opinion. I managed to track down a copy of the Kerosina hardcover edition (not the limited edition) although the presence of the Wildside Press should hopefully mean more people get hold of it. I will probably include Kaeti On Tour with my next order from Cold Tonnage.
>Now, really: who has both "The New Trouser Press Record Guide" AND a "CRC"?

AND "Growing Up In Tier 3000"!
Thanks for the enlightenment: I think it's my favourite word for this month!
OK, I give up: what is "wingnuttery"?!

You're high on my list of "raw" booksharers at present, but I think that's because my catalogue currently prioritizes books in boxes under the bed, and that's where most of the SF is!
Hi Bob,

thanks for your reply. "Site Talk" is there such a group, or is it a fishing expedition.

I seem to miss a help link (for some of my basic questions) on this site.

anyway, belated A Merry Christmas and a Happy new Year.
Thanks for the reminder about Adventures in Unhistory! I'll have to put an order in for that.
Thanks for taking the time to look at the website.
Hi, I'm trying to upload covers to ace doubles that are normal sized. My two attempts have resulted in very small covers. I see you have the cover to People Minus X/Lest We Forget Thee, Earth that is normal sized. Did you upload the cover? If so can you tell me what you did? Thanks, Howie
Hey there. I wandered over here because you're apparently the person I share the most titles with (by raw numbers rather than weighted). Just out of curiosity, what's the point of the year tags you have? At first I thought it was when you had bought them, but then I noticed a few of them are from the 19th century, so that ruled that out. Is it publication years?

Anyway, I sympathize about shelf space. Of course, I have far, [i]far[/i] fewer books than you do, but I also only have a single room to put all my belongings in. Right now I have all the books I've read in storage, and the unread ones are all piled onto a single bookcase, all jumbled and out of any sort of order (which drives me nuts). Whenever I get around to getting my own house, I think I'm going to have to get at least one extra bedroom to function as a private library.

Maybe I can get them to build shelves into the walls.
Thanks for joining my group! I'm new here, and as I'm entering all my books manually (I have particular bibliographic tastes) it will be some time before I get very much stuff in here.
Minneapolis got lucky with its SF scene, or something. Cliff Simak and Gordy Dickson were the old-line authors living here (and Gordy in particular had considerable interaction with local fandom), but then in the 1980s the Scribblies started up. At one point they each told their "origin story" for the group, all different of course, and I've got my own, which is that I introduced Pamela and Pat Wrede, who I knew from college, to Steven Brust, who I knew from highschool, and to Nate Bucklin and Emma Bull and Will Shetterly, who I knew from fandom, and they ended up forming the Scribblies and all becoming published authors. In the 90s Mike Ford and Joel Rosenberg ended up moving here from the east coast (Joel in particular got hooked in through the Fidonet SF echo, which I ran). There were also quite a lot of unrelated but significant new-author startups only moderately later, including Eleanor Arnason and Peg Kerr, both solidly connected to local fandom before they started writing. Lois Bujold moved here because she knew Pat Wrede (and, I like to think, because she got a nice look at the place when I invited her to be guest of honor at Minicon 27). Caroline Stevermer just sort of appeared, and had been writing before she appeared to us. Lots of others around these days, we really grew quite a collection; even if Steven and Will and Emma are now all out west.

I remember the Konica T3 as being quite an important product in some ways; though not to me personally. I didn't have an auto-exposure camera until 1987, when I got an Olympus OM-4T; I'm a bit of a curmudgeon on the topic of exposure automation still. My first SLR was a Miranda Sensorex; decent enough, but a clear mistake for me (courtesy of Consumer Reports; I like them better than any other consumer review magazine, they're the only one that understands statistics for one thing, but they're not so good at reviewing things for specialized markets, and for me camera and computer gear isn't just ordinary consumer toys). I eventually traded that for an Asahi Pentax Spotmatic and a Leica M3, then replaced those when they were stolen out of my house with a Nikon FM (about 1980). Switched to Olympus in 1987 for the multi-spot metering, and back to Nikon in 1994 for auto-focus. My first DSLR was a Fuji S2 (Nikon mount) in 2003 (well, 30-Jan-2002), and I upgraded that to a D200 last spring (in time for Minicon of course). I've still got a darkroom in boxes around the basement here, including an Omega D5 enlarger and three lenses (there are 4x5 and 6x4.5 cameras around too, though little used). At this point the darkroom is not, I think, going to happen again. There's some slight possibility I might shoot B&W film and develop it weirdly and then scan it still, but that's about all.

"Dave Powell" rings a bell -- but maybe I'm wrong, because he doesn't seem to show up on the seating chart for where I worked. I was a Large Computer Group guy, Marlboro MA, from 1981 to 1985.

Yes, my photos certainly were linked from Making Light, and I comment there occasionally also. We've known Patrick and Teresa for quite a while at this point, though I didn't really meet him when he came through Minneapolis as a 16-year-old wandering around fandom.

Well, pleasant as this is, I think there are some people expecting some code to be commmitted today, so I'd better type at the other keyboard for a while.

Cheers!
Yes, I knew Mike Ford. I know the vast majority of the local authors to some degree or other, from Pamela Dean, who I am married to, on down. I went to college with Pat Wrede, highschool with Steven Brust (no longer local, but he got started here), and such. I assembled the memorial photo display for Mike's memorial gathering here; photos of the memorial are in my snapshot album (it was 27-Oct I believe) on my web site, as given in my profile here.

Huh; strange commenting/discussion system here, clicking "reply" on your comment that showed up under my profile shows me making a new comment under your profile, with your response to my comment nowhere in sight.

I've liked the idea of cataloging my library for more than 30 years. I first started doing so on punch cards. I next started, *much* later, using ReaderWare and a cuecat scanner, and I've still got that data. That was new books and books I reread, fairly consistently for a while. At this point it'd be all four of our libraries, with owner codes and location codes (since there are very few rooms in this house with no books -- just the bathrooms and kitchens, water and books don't mix). But taking it on systematically is a HUGE job, and then I think of the high risk of it getting out of date; recovering from an out of data situation is almost as big a job as entering it in the first place. (We're talking somewhere around 15k volumes I'd guesstimate).

I certainly like the idea of having the listing with me -- and in fact I've got the Palm Pilot module from Readerware so I can do that with that database.

But LibraryThing has its own charm, too. I'm a sucker for online communities, starting with Arpanet mailing lists, then Usenet, and I ran the Fidonet SF echo and their WRITING echo for a while in the late 80s/early 90s. I don't know if that's an attraction for LT or a reason to run screaming :-).

I lived out in the Boston area 1981-1985 (working for DEC), then came back to Minneapolis. I've been pretty visible various online places, and in some parts of SF fandom; I was in charge of photography for the retrospective slide show at Noreascon III. We could have overlapped any number of ways. I'm the only David Dyer-Bennet on the planet so far.
Hi! Your handle po