David Christopher Lane

Disappointing. The reading selections were interesting enough, but the editor missed an easy opportunity to increase the reader's experience. He provides no background on the authors, or even citation of the source and the year of publication. We thus have no sense of why these readings were chosen. There is further evidence of lazy editing: one excerpt was block pasted from another source, but the page numbers were not removed. In short, this deserves one star, but the sections themselves are mostly interesting, so I gave it another.… (mer)