Ronald E. Osborn (2)

Excellent exposition of the problems of theodicy and animal suffering. Osborn's main theme is that "scientific" Creationism, with it's focus on a completely literal reading of Genesis, does not, in fact, answer the deep questions around animal suffering that is inherent in our current animal world. Although less literal readings, that allow more space for a longer history for life on earth and which accommodate some aspects of macroevolution (a la theistic evolution) do not completely relieve the tension of animal suffering, Osborn believes non-literal approaches at least make it easier to approach the issues.

Osborn also does a good job of showing that the Sabbath is by no means dependent on a literal, 7-day (24 hour days) creation week. The story, as told, is important as a reaching device, as I have always maintained myself, but even if it is not literal, it does not detract from the theological truths and richness of the Sabbath.… (mer)

Brilliant! Fundamentalist and literalistic readings of the biblical text are one of the banes of the Evangelical wing of Christianity. It has the loudest voice in Christendom, especially in the US, and many of those in this group believe their “truth” should be imposed on other Christians and, frequently, on others in secular and diversely religious or non-religious communities. The first half of the book alone is worth its price. Even non-believers in religion would benefit from reading the first half of the book, many of whom are just literalistic in their reading of ancient texts as the Christian fundamentalists. Highly recommended.… (mer)