Bild på författaren.

Murray Rothbard (1926–1995)

Författare till For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto

122+ verk 4,126 medlemmar 42 recensioner 28 favoritmärkta

Om författaren


Verk av Murray Rothbard

For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto (1973) 369 exemplar, 8 recensioner
What Has Government Done to Our Money? (1963) 367 exemplar, 5 recensioner
America's Great Depression (1963) 344 exemplar, 3 recensioner
The Ethics of Liberty (1982) 293 exemplar, 5 recensioner
Anatomy of the State (2009) 236 exemplar, 4 recensioner
The Case Against the Fed (1994) 225 exemplar, 2 recensioner
Man, Economy, and State (1970) 200 exemplar
The Mystery of Banking (1983) 151 exemplar, 1 recension
Conceived in Liberty (4 vols) (1979) 124 exemplar, 1 recension
Power and Market: Government and the Economy (1977) 88 exemplar, 1 recension
Education: Free & Compulsory (1971) 82 exemplar, 3 recensioner
Making Economic Sense (1995) 66 exemplar
The Betrayal of the American Right (2007) 57 exemplar, 2 recensioner
The Progressive Era (2017) 39 exemplar
The Essential von Mises (1973) 30 exemplar
Economic Controversies (2011) 29 exemplar
A new history of Leviathan; essays on the rise of the American corporate state. (1972) — Joint Comp. — 22 exemplar, 1 recension
Keynes, The Man (2010) 10 exemplar
The Rothbard Reader (2016) 7 exemplar
Rothbard vs the Philosophers (2009) 7 exemplar
Rothbard A to Z (2019) 3 exemplar
Lo Stato falsario 1 exemplar
Economistes et Charlatans (1991) 1 exemplar
Libertarian Forum 1 exemplar
Monopolio Y Competencia (1965) 1 exemplar
Ekonomie státních zásahù (2001) 1 exemplar
Özgürlük Arayislari (2016) 1 exemplar
Ekonomiyi Anlamak 1 exemplar
L'Éthique de la liberté (2011) 1 exemplar
Governo e Mercado 1 exemplar

Associerade verk

The Austrian Theory of the Trade Cycle and Other Essays (1996) — Bidragsgivare — 107 exemplar, 2 recensioner
In Search of Anti-Semitism (1992) — Bidragsgivare, vissa utgåvor63 exemplar, 2 recensioner
Modern Age: The First Twenty-Five Years (1810) — Bidragsgivare — 53 exemplar, 1 recension


Allmänna fakta



The state is a parasite that uses a variety of psychological, economic and violent tools to force people to sustain its boundless expansion. It rings true to some extent but rather onesidedly. The author contrasts the state with "the people". One is bad, one is good. A thought immediately springs to mind: what about corporations? If corporations are not the state but rather "the people" and corporations are known to behave rather badly when unchecked - then both sides are bad. One is bad, the other is bad, everything is bad. But if corporations are small states and "the people" are good then what is the proposed way of organising labor and allocating resources among "the people"? Can "the people" survive without the state?
In the end the text felt like an angry pamphlet against immoral power abusers. Perhaps the author is right and we are all just subjects to a number of ever growing parasites that have encompassed the earth but what do i do about it?
… (mer)
rubyman | 3 andra recensioner | Feb 21, 2024 |
If this had been the only book on libertarianism I had ever read, I would probably have become an authoritarian. I'm aware that academics often use words differently than us normies do, but the idea that there is a school of "ethics" that includes allowing one's own baby to starve to death is unfathomable.

Clearly by the 1980s Rothbard was already well on his journey right-ward from the leftist activists had the pleasure of working with in the 1960s Peace & Liberty Party and the author of radical works like "Man economy & State." He spends the whole book looking at his basis for an economic and "legal" system in a libertarian society and expanding upon those for various parts of life and society. However, he just accepts his own basis as fact and doesn't even seem to attempt to argue why that should be a basis of any thought, let alone libertarianism. This is particularly true in the first section of property ownership. There is no explanation why mixing one's labor with unowned property automatically makes it the private property of the laborer. There is no question as to the idea that an individual can be private property, even to himself, while also claiming that slavery, even so-called voluntary slavery, is unethical. There is absolutely no explanation why inheritance is considered an ethical transfer of private property rights, but a promise to do so is not. (There are plenty of reasons he says why a promise is not, but I see that as little difference than inheritance). There was a whole chapter on the transfer of land titles and the problem of tracking such back to its rightful owner, yet there was 0 reference to the obvious cases of this such as European colonialization into Australia, Africa, & the Americas. An incredible western European centric viewpoint, particularly when you consider Rothbard was an American Jew.

One thing he did do right was right in the introduction he made it clear that nothing contained within would be able to challenge Marxists ideals, including the labor-theory-of-value, as the ideas are so far apart, they can't even be compared properly.

I've been a Libertarian for over 20 years, and no argument against liberty written by a statist has come nearly close to making me question my belief in libertarianism as this one of the American libertarian right.
… (mer)
fulner | 4 andra recensioner | Nov 30, 2023 |
This is a very concise statement of the world's foremost anarcho-capitalist, Murray Rothbard's, view of the state. It's pretty dense and not particularly suited to the audiobook format, although the argument doesn't rely on weird redefinitions or anything else -- more, that the impact of relatively simple statements takes some reflection to consider. Probably better as a print book, although the narration was technically fine.

Rothbard's beliefs are certainly extreme, but even if you don't agree fully with them, they seem to be a logically consistent belief system and are worth learning about.… (mer)
octal | 3 andra recensioner | Jan 1, 2021 |
Great ideas and philosophy! Unfortunately not part of the ANC's planning, but still a model to be pursued, and a new perspective on the role of government. Goes all American in the middle if you have to criticize, but still interesting.

A must-read!
rendier | 7 andra recensioner | Dec 20, 2020 |



Du skulle kanske också gilla

Associerade författare


Även av

Tabeller & diagram