Ty Roth

Admittedly, it took me a while to get around to reading this book. For that, I'm profoundly sorry. But I can say that I really, really loved this book. I can't count the number of times that I laughed out loud while reading it. The author, Ty Roth, deftly mixes humor amongst the darker themes for a great balance. Keats is a funny fellow. He's a great narrator with keen observations. As the story of the three unfolds, the characters take shape. Gordon is the most colorful of the three and his character demands to stand out. He craves attention constantly. Keats is a pallid sidekick who pines for Shelly, but feels too inadequate in Gordon's wake to ever speak up. Shelly has her own unrequited love, only it's directed towards Gordon. We get to know her better as the story of their past gets revealed. Keats deep self examination throughout the book gives him more shape and as he evolves becomes quite endearing.

This was a lovely book and the info given at the end regarding the actual Keats, Byron and Shelley was extremely interesting. I thought that since I knew little of Keats, Byron and Shelley that may get in the way of enjoying this book. Not in the slightest though. It was a wonderful story with a very contemporary message about living in the now and being present in every moment. Something we can all use a little reminder about from time to time. I'm giving this one 5 shiny kisses!… (mer)

I was interested in this book because the three main characters, Byron Gordon, John Keats, and the mysterious Shelly are named after three famous English romantic poets. How would the author integrate the 19th century into a novel about high schoolers in the 21st? As it turns out, I'm not sure how well he did--I was sort of confounded by this novel.

The story is about two boys whom the readers first meet as they are about to steal the ashes of a dead classmate from the high school gym where her memorial has taken place and right out from under her father's nose. Readers learn that Gordon Byron and John Keats, who are not friends and barely know each other, have been requested by the dead Shelly to give her a "proper" burial, at sea, with REM playing in the background (in a plot strangely close to a Better Than Ezra song). In this way Shelly is able to flush out her character fully, each to the other boy, who knows parts but not all of her story. It is also a narrative device to reveal her to the readers.

What stood out to me most of all, however, wasn't the revealing of Shelly and the reasons for her death. I'm not sure I was ever made to care about that. Instead, it was the narcissism of Gordon, who is definitely the main character if not the titled one, and the detachment of John Keats from both characters, even though he admits to confusing feelings about each. In a historical sense, both of these features are fair representations of the literary past. George Gordon, Lord Byron was an ennobled "playa" with very little recognition of the needs or even the humanity of his conquests; and Keats, the poet, a very young and sensitive boy much enamored with the romanticism found in natural beauty. Keats and Shelley had been friends and admirers in real life, but Keats never actually met Lord Byron, although Byron took great liberty in criticizing Keats's work, which he saw as simple and unschooled.

The events described in this YA novel, particularly those of a sexual nature--meaningless conquests, incest, abuse, rape--have a grounding in literary history but translate poorly to a contemporary American high school. It's not that I am naive in my thinking: yes, teens today deal with these issues and more. My concern is that these traumatic events became the basis for a romantic sensibility in 19th century England that the world may never see again, but in reality, today would lead to foster care, underperformance/high drop-out rates in school, and some type of reform--maybe even prison--certainly a difficult tangling of truth and fiction for students to unravel. And the Greek terrorist spy thing? Just silly.

Target audience is young adult--high school--but many parents and plenty of younger high schoolers would be troubled by the content. I was a little troubled.

Amazon.com says 14+ but I think 15-16 would be more appropriate.… (mer)