Nope. Too many of the puzzles are either 1. dependent on the solver knowing the rules of chess, or tertiary maths, or other trivia or 2. can be solved by tedious 'guess & check.' Almost none of the answers explain how one could have solved the problem, but will just say 11" or whatever. And there is no organization, either by type of problem or level of difficulty - maybe a progression would have 'trained' me to be able to solve easy ones first and learn how before more difficult one.
Otoh, if you're some genius like my friend JK and you let me hand this copy over to you for free, you might find a challenge or two. There is a fair variety of kinds of puzzles, so that makes it a book I don't feel bad about passing onwards."… (mer)
Denna webbplats använder kakor för att fungera optimalt, analysera användarbeteende och för att visa reklam (om du inte är inloggad). Genom att använda LibraryThing intygar du att du har läst och förstått våra Regler och integritetspolicy. All användning av denna webbplats lyder under dessa regler.
Otoh, if you're some genius like my friend JK and you let me hand this copy over to you for free, you might find a challenge or two. There is a fair variety of kinds of puzzles, so that makes it a book I don't feel bad about passing onwards."… (mer)