Best Historical Fiction

longway: It is a thriller novel about an attempt to kill French President De Gaulle, written aroud ten years later the real attempt which inspire the novel

Matteocalosi : Not historical fiction

RobPoulton : contemporary adventure fiction

lamotamant: This book made historical fiction multi-POVs a complete addiction for me.

RuMuse: England, the 1520s. Henry VIII is on the throne, but lacks an heir, which creates ongoing crises. Told from POV of Thomas Cromwell.

elkiedee : I absolutely loved this when I read it but it was over 30 years ago now. I should reread, and would recommend to people who love historical fiction. I am thumbing it down because it's not a historical novel, it is a dual narrative story with a large part set in the past, but also a novel largely set in the author's present at the time of writing (late 1980s, published 1990).

aulsmith : More legendary than historical

elkiedee : I love this novel - but it's not historical fiction - it's a mostly contemporary novel with historical appeal. The main character is a 20th century police detective convalescing in bed and "investigating" the case of Richard III and the Princes in the Tower, but it's set in the author's present day.

aulsmith : Doesn't meet my definition of historical fiction.

sturlington : Took place during the author's lifetime and based partly on his experiences.

elkiedee: Historical fiction is set in the past but it can be a period within the author's lifetime - the past can look very different from 25 or 40 years later. I hope no one who argues this isn't a historical novel believes that either Possession or The Daughter of Time, both above this in the list, are historical fiction. They are brilliant novels which I would recommend to fans of historical fiction but they are both contemporary novels with significant interest for historical fiction readers.

leslie.98 : Not historical fiction

aulsmith : Does not meet my definition of historical fiction. Author lived during the time period written about.

leslie.98 : Not historical fiction

sturlington : DNF

smcwl : Not written as historical fiction.

elkiedee: I think historical fiction can be set in the relatively recent past. 10 years after the war writers in countries on all sides might well have had a very different perspective on those events. I would have no problem regarding a novel written this year but about the Iraq war that started in 2003 and ending before this, as historical fiction. Or a book set in Britain under the last Labour government, or the US just after Obama was elected or reelected, as historical fiction. I think it might be a bit soon to consider a pandemic novel historical fiction, but maybe within 5 years it will be part of our history.

Matteocalosi : Partly autobiographical and written only 10 years after the end of the war, not historical fiction

leslie.98 : Not historical fiction

aulsmith : More legendary than historical

sturlington : I'd call this fantasy.

RobPoulton : Arthurian fantasy

sturlington : DNF

RobPoulton : Not historical fiction. Published in 1885 it describes fictional contemporary events and starts the trend for Lost World scenarios in genre fiction.

sturlington : I wouldn't consider this historical fiction.

hoddybook : This is fantasy not history

aulsmith : More legendary than historical

aulsmith : Not historical fiction by my definition.

aulsmith : Not historical fiction by my definition.

RobPoulton : not historical fiction, more an alternative fantasy history

aulsmith : Not historical fiction by my definition.

leslie.98 : not historical fiction

aulsmith : More legendary than historical

aulsmith : Not historical fiction by my definition. Main characters are not from historical time period.

sturlington : Science fiction.