Klicka på en bild för att gå till Google Book Search.
Laddar... The Good Cripple (1996)av Rodrigo Rey Rosa
Ingen/inga Laddar...
Gå med i LibraryThing för att få reda på om du skulle tycka om den här boken. Det finns inga diskussioner på LibraryThing om den här boken. inga recensioner | lägg till en recension
A young man, Juan Luis Luna, is kidnapped in Guatemala City and held at the bottom of a rusty, empty underground fuel tank in an abandoned gas station. The kidnappers demand a ransom; his rich father does not reply. The kidnappers threaten to cut off his son's foot and still hear nothing. They then slice off one of Juan Luis's toes and send it to his father, who still refuses to act. So the next day...The Good Cripple obsessively focused, chilling, allegorical is stunningly explosive. With its enigmatic beginning, however, and its circular relentless structure, the novel is also dense with ideas: can one be whole after mutilation? Can the injured transcend violence? Rodrigo Rey Rosa's style is of a lithe pristine clarity, but beneath that calm surface cruelty, revenge, and diffidence churn darkly away.The Good Cripple is an astonishingly intense book, and as unforgettable as the sight of "the place where the foot had been severed, where a circle of red flesh, now a little black along the edges, could be seen, with a concentric circle of white bone that was both milky and glassy..." Inga biblioteksbeskrivningar kunde hittas. |
Pågående diskussionerIngen/ingaPopulära omslag
Google Books — Laddar... GenrerMelvil Decimal System (DDC)863.64Literature Spanish and Portuguese Spanish fiction 20th Century 1945-2000Klassifikation enligt LCBetygMedelbetyg:
Är det här du? |
As I finished this book, I decided it reminded me a lot of a movie. It took somewhere around two hours to read. there was an opening scene, the type that might go before the credits, followed by a shift backward in time to tell the story that propelled the characters from the opening scene to reunite decades later. The story jumped around, from Guatemala to a brief spell of globetrotting in the United States and Europe, followed by an interlude in Morocco and a return to Guatemala for the closing chapter. There were twists and turns that kept me on the edge of my seat. And there was a somewhat enigmatic ending, the type of ending that would give the audience one last surprise, one last jarring image in a story where a grenade is thrown at an occupied car and a young man has bodily members cut off and sent to his father to encourage the father to pay his son's ransom. It's a book that could totally be made into a movie, you'd hardly even need to adapt it into a script, and I imagine some young, influential Latino actor or director throwing his weight behind a project based on this book after reading and enjoying it. I actually had this same feeling after reading a few of Roberto Bolaño's books, that someday I'd be seeing them on the big screen and they'd either be critical successes or they'd be mildly disappointing. I usually don't ask too much of the film versions of the books I love. You name the Vonnegut novel, I've loved the movie: Slaughterhouse Five, Mother Night, Breakfast of Champions (which was apparently critically panned)...It's always fun to see a book you've enjoyed on screen. Just today I was watching an old Leopoldo Torre Nilsson production of Roberto Arlt's Los siete locos and Los lanzallamas. I thought maybe it wasn't that great of a movie, but boy did I enjoy seeing those characters that I knew so well talk to each other and come to life on my computer screen. I digress. If this were a movie, I'd definitely see it and I think it'd be a pretty good one.
I've read other books that I've imagined being adapted into movies. They had the twists and turns that Hollywood audiences and film critics love. They would earn Oscar nominations if they were done right. I'm pretty sure we'll see movie versions of Life of Pi and The Shadow of the Wind in the future. I read on the internet that M. Night Shyamalan was once attached to a film version of Life of Pi and I can't help thinking that M. Night 2011 must wish that M. Night 2003 had decided to make that movie instead of Lady in the Water. We've already seen a movie version of The Kite Runner, although I did not see it because I did not enjoy the book. With those blockbuster books, I ended up feeling almost offended by the thought that the authors were writing books with Hollywood movie dollar signs running through their heads. The film adaptation seemed like the logical and profitable next step, and I wondered if they had it in mind the whole time. But those books were different than this one, they took the customary six to eight hours or so to read and they'd need to be adapted to fit the two hour movie time. They just played with emotions and tugged on heartstrings in oft-predictable ways that made me think of million dollar scripts and test screenings. This book flowed like a movie. I sat down and 100 minutes later I was done. Maybe Rey Rosa was dreaming of movie deals and money too, and maybe this book isn't too much different than the others I vaguely disliked due to their imagined ties to future movie rights. I think what made the difference in this case was the commitment to the experience, the way that the book fit the temporal parameters of a trip to the theater. I read the book as I could have watched the movie on a Sunday, and later that evening I went to sleep. ( )