HemGrupperDiskuteraMerTidsandan
Känner du till SantaThing, LibraryThings julklappsbyte?
avfärda
Denna webbplats använder kakor för att fungera optimalt, analysera användarbeteende och för att visa reklam (om du inte är inloggad). Genom att använda LibraryThing intygar du att du har läst och förstått våra Regler och integritetspolicy. All användning av denna webbplats lyder under dessa regler.
Hide this

Resultat från Google Book Search

Klicka på en bild för att gå till Google Book Search.

Laddar...

The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great… (2006)

av Timothy Egan

MedlemmarRecensionerPopularitetGenomsnittligt betygOmnämnanden
3,5681732,532 (4.17)531
"The dust storms that terrorized America's High Plains in the darkest years of the Depression were like nothing ever seen before or since, and the stories of the people that held on have never been fully told. Pulitzer Prize-winning New York Times journalist and author Timothy Egan follows a half-dozen families and their communities through the rise and fall of the region, going from sod homes to new framed houses to huddling in basements with the windows sealed by damp sheets in a futile effort to keep the dust out. He follows their desperate attempts to carry on through blinding black blizzards, crop failure, and the deaths of loved ones. Drawing on the voices of those who stayed and survived - those who, now in their eighties and nineties, will soon carry their memories to the grave - Egan tells a story of endurance and heroism against the backdrop of the Great Depression."… (mer)
  1. 50
    The Children's Blizzard av David Laskin (lyzadanger)
    lyzadanger: Similar themes: pioneers and farmers facing the wrath of nature in middle America; relatively compelling pop history.
  2. 20
    Under This Unbroken Sky: A Novel av Shandi Mitchell (vancouverdeb)
    vancouverdeb: A story of immigrant prairie homesteaders in Canada during the 1930's. Tough times.
  3. 10
    Dust Bowl: The Southern Plains in the 1930s av Donald Worster (eromsted)
  4. 10
    Locust: The Devastating Rise and Mysterious Disappearance of the Insect That Shaped the American Frontier av Jeffrey A. Lockwood (sjmccreary)
    sjmccreary: another overwhelming hardship for farm families in the plains - also very readable
  5. 00
    Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations av David R. Montgomery (lbeaumont)
  6. 00
    Harpsong av Rilla Askew (GCPLreader)
  7. 01
    Bad land : ett amerikanskt äventyr av Jonathan Raban (etxgardener, RidgewayGirl)
    etxgardener: If you liked The Worst Hard Time, your love Bad Land which describes the same ezperience in the northern plains.
    RidgewayGirl: A different part of the country, but a similar tale of immigrant farmers and enormous determination.
Laddar...

Gå med i LibraryThing för att få reda på om du skulle tycka om den här boken.

Det finns inga diskussioner på LibraryThing om den här boken.

» Se även 531 omnämnanden

Visa 1-5 av 172 (nästa | visa alla)
Epic story of the environmental disaster in the American high plains in the darkest years of the Depression. This is the story of the people who stayed and survived a story of endurance and heroism. ( )
  janismack | Nov 6, 2020 |
This book managed at times to almost move me to tears of compassion for the people affected by the Great Depression and absolute white-hot rage at how the land was treated.

First about the people: insofar as they suffered from the economic effects of the Great Depression and the accompanying collapse in commodities prices (beyond their control) and a severe drought (also beyond their control), I was moved by their plight. It didn’t help that the government’s response at the time came very late and was too late for some. I found it astounding that there was no government attempt to buy up the surplus crops and ship them to the cities where there were severe food shortages, which would have helped solve two problems at once, at least in the beginning. Also, I can’t really grasp why it was allowed to rot; grains will keep for years if dried and could have been stored for later use. I also found it surprising that there did not appear to be any attempts (either public or private) to encourage the cultivation of other crops, at least before the drought hit, which might have helped with the issues of large wheat surpluses. And I can’t see it as being any worse than the adopted strategy of plowing up even more land to grow even more wheat to compensate for lower prices. It’s not as if they had invested years in waiting for fruit or nut trees to start bearing; wheat is an annual and a fairly weak one at that. To be fair, the government did eventually step in, but not until 1934. Part of the reason the government did become involved was because Hugh Bennett, one of the country’s top soil scientists, realized the cause of what was going on, and launched a lobbying campaign to convince Congress to start attempting to prevent or at least mitigate the consequences. The Great Plains Drought Area Committee was also established to investigate and report on what had happened and why. The Committee issued its report in 1936, which included a significant map:

“An accompanying map showed the president what was obvious to any student of American geography: the nation’s midsection west of the 98th meridian, from the Canadian border to Mexico, received only twenty inches of yearly rainfall or less. This was simply not enough rain to raise crops, no matter how much “dust-mulching” or other dry farming gimmicks were promoted, and it was why banks for so long had refused to lend money in this arid zone. During the drought, the dry states had received anywhere from five to twelve inches annually.” (Pages 266-267).

It also gave a timeline that showed how rapid the environmental degradation that led to the Dust Bowl was:

“The report moved on to how the disaster had unfolded – a chronology of collapse. One chart showed how quickly the grass was overturned. In 1879, ten million acres were plowed. Fifty years later, the total was one hundred million acres. Grass was needed to hold the soil in place; it was nature’s way of adapting to the basic conditions of the plains, the high wind and low rainfall. Buffalo grass, in particular, short and drought-resistant, was nature’s refinement over centuries.” (Page 267).

I think government intervention should have been much earlier, given that this was a massive disaster with damage and displacement effects comparable to those of a major hurricane, but the response outside of the affected areas seems to have been largely one of denial that any disaster of such a scale was in progress, at least until the dust plumes began reaching cities on the East Coast, along with a dust storm with soil from the Great Plains, which got into the jet stream and hit New York City before heading out to sea.

Areas affected:



An illustration of the scale of the dust storms:



Now about the treatment of the land, which was under their control, and moved me to white-hot rage. The sod that the homesteaders plowed up was vital to keeping the topsoil bound to the land, even in the harshest conditions:

“When the native sod of the Great Plains was in place, it did not matter if people looked twice at a piece of ground. Wind blew twenty, thirty, forty miles an hour, as always. Droughts came and went. Prairie fires…took a great gulp of grass in a few days. Hailstorms pounded the land. Blue northers froze it so hard it was like broken glass to walk on…As long as the weave of grass was stitched to the land, the prairie would flourish in dry years and wet. The grass could look brown and dead, but beneath the surface, the roots held the soil in place; it was alive and dormant. The short grass, buffalo and blue grama, had evolved as the perfect fit for the sandy loam of the arid zone. It could hold moisture a foot or more below ground level even during summer droughts, when hot winds robbed the surface of all water-bearing life. In turn, the grass nurtured pin-tailed grouse, prairie chickens, cranes, jackrabbits, snakes, and other creatures that got their water from foraging on the native turf. Through the driest years, the web of life held. When a farmer tore out the sod and then walked away, leaving the land naked, however, that barren patch posed a threat to neighbors. It could not revert to grass, because the roots were gone. It was empty, dead, and transient…So when the winds blew in the winter of 1932, they picked up the soil with little resistance and sent it skyward.” (Pages 112-113).

So the Dust Bowl was really a man-made disaster, caused by the desire to grow wheat on the Great Plains regardless of the ecological consequences. At first, during World War 1 and for some time afterwards, this was because wheat was an incredibly profitable commodity. But this changed during the Great Depression, and as the collapse in commodities prices continued, they responded by ploughing even more ground to plant more wheat. This became a vicious cycle, and when wheat prices declined to point where farmers began losing money on their crop, they simply walked away and left the plowed-up land behind to dry up and be swept away by the wind. Eighty years later, the land is still being affected and what remains of the soil in some areas is still being blown away by the wind. And yet the author had the unmitigated gall to keep repeating that the land betrayed the people living on it. But it is nothing short of criminal to say the land betrayed anyone. It was people who betrayed the land through irresponsible agricultural practices, and the land fought back.

Several people at the time seemed to think of the situation in similar terms, “…the Kansas newspaperman William Allen White, said he knew who was to blame, and it was time for people in the Great Plains to look inside themselves and acknowledge what they had done. He blamed the wheat farmer who broke ground at a gluttonous pace.” Similarly, the filmmaker Pare Lorentz, who filmed “The Plow That Broke the Plains,” blamed poor agricultural practices for the problem. “The Plow That Broke the Plains” became one of the most influential documentaries ever made, and it remains the only film the government produced a film intended for broad commercial release during peacetime. Hugh Bennett, one of the country’s top soil scientists at the time agreed. So did The New York Times; in 1935, one of its Midwest correspondents wrote that the land had been “plowed recklessly” and that as a result of the drought and the loss of their native vegetation, “these arid lands have taken wing.”

In the end, the southern plains lost over 850 million tons of topsoil, and over so large an area that the homesteaders on the High Plains could recognize whether the dust came from Kansas (if it was black), eastern Oklahoma (red), or Texas (yellow-orange). Sometimes a major storm would combine all three. To get an idea of just how much was lost and the extent of the environmental disaster, it is estimated that an inch of good topsoil takes about a thousand years to form.

There are a few exceptions to this legacy of betrayal. One is the patches of National Grasslands System (established in the 1960’s and administered by the Forest Service) and the Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie, where the native grasses of the Great Plains are being re-established. And at least in the Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie, there has been an attempt to re-create the original ecosystem, including reintroducing bison to the area. Still, this is a minute fraction of what is needed to repair the soil in these areas.

The National Grasslands are marked in yellow on this map:


By U.S. Forest Service - http://www.fs.fed.us/maps/, Public Domain, Link

Oglala National Grassland:


By Brian Kell (Bkell) - Own work, Public Domain, Link

The Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie:


By Alanscottwalker - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, Link

The other exception is Hugh Bennett’s activism, which led to Congress enacting the Soil Conservation Act, the first time any nation enacted laws to protect the soil and establish soil conservation districts to protect and sustain what was left, as well as restore other areas if possible. These soil conservation districts still exist today, the only grassroots New Deal organizations to survive the Great Depression. They were credited with mitigating the effects of several later droughts:

“During a three-year drought in the 1950s, dusters returned…Droughts in 1974-1976 and 2000-2003 made the soil drift. But overall, the earth held much better…In 2004, an extensive study of how farmers treated the land before and after the great dusters of the 1930s concluded that soil conservation districts kept the earth from blowing…What saved the land, this study found, was what Hugh Bennet had started: getting farmers to enter contracts with a soil conservation district and manage the land as a single ecological unit…”

Hugh Bennett was seventy-nine when he died in 1960 and is now buried in Arlington National Cemetery in honor of his work.

The Ogallala aquifer also came in for discussion in this book. The Ogallala Aquifer is the largest aquifer in the country and supplies thirty percent of its drinking water. The water is seven hundred feet down and took millennia to form. When it was originally discovered, it was advertised as an “endless lake” available to anyone with a well and a windmill, and the perfect source of water for irrigation. And it was treated that way, without anyone paying attention to how the limited rainfall in the region would affect how quickly the water removed from the aquifer was replenished. As it turns out, the aquifer is recharged at rates of centimeters per year while its water is being extracted at rates of meters per year. The aquifer has been nearly drained dry in the panhandle regions of Texas and Oklahoma. It makes me want to pound my fist on the table and shout “this is criminal!” And, at least as far as I know, there have been no efforts to limit withdrawals from the aquifer. Now we are building an oil pipeline directly though it. Again, the land has not betrayed anyone; we have betrayed the land.


Public Domain, Link

Keystone Pipeline route:



And now we have moved on to “bigger and better” things and are dumping carbon dioxide into the atmosphere without a second thought, and no doubt there will soon be complaints about how the planet has betrayed us. No; if there is any betrayal going on it is humanity that has betrayed the planet, and it will fight back too. ( )
  Jennifer708 | Mar 21, 2020 |
This book managed at times to almost move me to tears of compassion for the people affected by the Great Depression and absolute white-hot rage at how the land was treated.

First about the people: insofar as they suffered from the economic effects of the Great Depression and the accompanying collapse in commodities prices (beyond their control) and a severe drought (also beyond their control), I was moved by their plight. It didn’t help that the government’s response at the time came very late and was too late for some. I found it astounding that there was no government attempt to buy up the surplus crops and ship them to the cities where there were severe food shortages, which would have helped solve two problems at once, at least in the beginning. Also, I can’t really grasp why it was allowed to rot; grains will keep for years if dried and could have been stored for later use. I also found it surprising that there did not appear to be any attempts (either public or private) to encourage the cultivation of other crops, at least before the drought hit, which might have helped with the issues of large wheat surpluses. And I can’t see it as being any worse than the adopted strategy of plowing up even more land to grow even more wheat to compensate for lower prices. It’s not as if they had invested years in waiting for fruit or nut trees to start bearing; wheat is an annual and a fairly weak one at that. To be fair, the government did eventually step in, but not until 1934. Part of the reason the government did become involved was because Hugh Bennett, one of the country’s top soil scientists, realized the cause of what was going on, and launched a lobbying campaign to convince Congress to start attempting to prevent or at least mitigate the consequences. The Great Plains Drought Area Committee was also established to investigate and report on what had happened and why. The Committee issued its report in 1936, which included a significant map:

“An accompanying map showed the president what was obvious to any student of American geography: the nation’s midsection west of the 98th meridian, from the Canadian border to Mexico, received only twenty inches of yearly rainfall or less. This was simply not enough rain to raise crops, no matter how much “dust-mulching” or other dry farming gimmicks were promoted, and it was why banks for so long had refused to lend money in this arid zone. During the drought, the dry states had received anywhere from five to twelve inches annually.” (Pages 266-267).

It also gave a timeline that showed how rapid the environmental degradation that led to the Dust Bowl was:

“The report moved on to how the disaster had unfolded – a chronology of collapse. One chart showed how quickly the grass was overturned. In 1879, ten million acres were plowed. Fifty years later, the total was one hundred million acres. Grass was needed to hold the soil in place; it was nature’s way of adapting to the basic conditions of the plains, the high wind and low rainfall. Buffalo grass, in particular, short and drought-resistant, was nature’s refinement over centuries.” (Page 267).

I think government intervention should have been much earlier, given that this was a massive disaster with damage and displacement effects comparable to those of a major hurricane, but the response outside of the affected areas seems to have been largely one of denial that any disaster of such a scale was in progress, at least until the dust plumes began reaching cities on the East Coast, along with a dust storm with soil from the Great Plains, which got into the jet stream and hit New York City before heading out to sea.

Areas affected:



An illustration of the scale of the dust storms:



Now about the treatment of the land, which was under their control, and moved me to white-hot rage. The sod that the homesteaders plowed up was vital to keeping the topsoil bound to the land, even in the harshest conditions:

“When the native sod of the Great Plains was in place, it did not matter if people looked twice at a piece of ground. Wind blew twenty, thirty, forty miles an hour, as always. Droughts came and went. Prairie fires…took a great gulp of grass in a few days. Hailstorms pounded the land. Blue northers froze it so hard it was like broken glass to walk on…As long as the weave of grass was stitched to the land, the prairie would flourish in dry years and wet. The grass could look brown and dead, but beneath the surface, the roots held the soil in place; it was alive and dormant. The short grass, buffalo and blue grama, had evolved as the perfect fit for the sandy loam of the arid zone. It could hold moisture a foot or more below ground level even during summer droughts, when hot winds robbed the surface of all water-bearing life. In turn, the grass nurtured pin-tailed grouse, prairie chickens, cranes, jackrabbits, snakes, and other creatures that got their water from foraging on the native turf. Through the driest years, the web of life held. When a farmer tore out the sod and then walked away, leaving the land naked, however, that barren patch posed a threat to neighbors. It could not revert to grass, because the roots were gone. It was empty, dead, and transient…So when the winds blew in the winter of 1932, they picked up the soil with little resistance and sent it skyward.” (Pages 112-113).

So the Dust Bowl was really a man-made disaster, caused by the desire to grow wheat on the Great Plains regardless of the ecological consequences. At first, during World War 1 and for some time afterwards, this was because wheat was an incredibly profitable commodity. But this changed during the Great Depression, and as the collapse in commodities prices continued, they responded by ploughing even more ground to plant more wheat. This became a vicious cycle, and when wheat prices declined to point where farmers began losing money on their crop, they simply walked away and left the plowed-up land behind to dry up and be swept away by the wind. Eighty years later, the land is still being affected and what remains of the soil in some areas is still being blown away by the wind. And yet the author had the unmitigated gall to keep repeating that the land betrayed the people living on it. But it is nothing short of criminal to say the land betrayed anyone. It was people who betrayed the land through irresponsible agricultural practices, and the land fought back.

Several people at the time seemed to think of the situation in similar terms, “…the Kansas newspaperman William Allen White, said he knew who was to blame, and it was time for people in the Great Plains to look inside themselves and acknowledge what they had done. He blamed the wheat farmer who broke ground at a gluttonous pace.” Similarly, the filmmaker Pare Lorentz, who filmed “The Plow That Broke the Plains,” blamed poor agricultural practices for the problem. “The Plow That Broke the Plains” became one of the most influential documentaries ever made, and it remains the only film the government produced a film intended for broad commercial release during peacetime. Hugh Bennett, one of the country’s top soil scientists at the time agreed. So did The New York Times; in 1935, one of its Midwest correspondents wrote that the land had been “plowed recklessly” and that as a result of the drought and the loss of their native vegetation, “these arid lands have taken wing.”

In the end, the southern plains lost over 850 million tons of topsoil, and over so large an area that the homesteaders on the High Plains could recognize whether the dust came from Kansas (if it was black), eastern Oklahoma (red), or Texas (yellow-orange). Sometimes a major storm would combine all three. To get an idea of just how much was lost and the extent of the environmental disaster, it is estimated that an inch of good topsoil takes about a thousand years to form.

There are a few exceptions to this legacy of betrayal. One is the patches of National Grasslands System (established in the 1960’s and administered by the Forest Service) and the Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie, where the native grasses of the Great Plains are being re-established. And at least in the Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie, there has been an attempt to re-create the original ecosystem, including reintroducing bison to the area. Still, this is a minute fraction of what is needed to repair the soil in these areas.

The National Grasslands are marked in yellow on this map:


By U.S. Forest Service - http://www.fs.fed.us/maps/, Public Domain, Link

Oglala National Grassland:


By Brian Kell (Bkell) - Own work, Public Domain, Link

The Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie:


By Alanscottwalker - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, Link

The other exception is Hugh Bennett’s activism, which led to Congress enacting the Soil Conservation Act, the first time any nation enacted laws to protect the soil and establish soil conservation districts to protect and sustain what was left, as well as restore other areas if possible. These soil conservation districts still exist today, the only grassroots New Deal organizations to survive the Great Depression. They were credited with mitigating the effects of several later droughts:

“During a three-year drought in the 1950s, dusters returned…Droughts in 1974-1976 and 2000-2003 made the soil drift. But overall, the earth held much better…In 2004, an extensive study of how farmers treated the land before and after the great dusters of the 1930s concluded that soil conservation districts kept the earth from blowing…What saved the land, this study found, was what Hugh Bennet had started: getting farmers to enter contracts with a soil conservation district and manage the land as a single ecological unit…”

Hugh Bennett was seventy-nine when he died in 1960 and is now buried in Arlington National Cemetery in honor of his work.

The Ogallala aquifer also came in for discussion in this book. The Ogallala Aquifer is the largest aquifer in the country and supplies thirty percent of its drinking water. The water is seven hundred feet down and took millennia to form. When it was originally discovered, it was advertised as an “endless lake” available to anyone with a well and a windmill, and the perfect source of water for irrigation. And it was treated that way, without anyone paying attention to how the limited rainfall in the region would affect how quickly the water removed from the aquifer was replenished. As it turns out, the aquifer is recharged at rates of centimeters per year while its water is being extracted at rates of meters per year. The aquifer has been nearly drained dry in the panhandle regions of Texas and Oklahoma. It makes me want to pound my fist on the table and shout “this is criminal!” And, at least as far as I know, there have been no efforts to limit withdrawals from the aquifer. Now we are building an oil pipeline directly though it. Again, the land has not betrayed anyone; we have betrayed the land.


Public Domain, Link

Keystone Pipeline route:



And now we have moved on to “bigger and better” things and are dumping carbon dioxide into the atmosphere without a second thought, and no doubt there will soon be complaints about how the planet has betrayed us. No; if there is any betrayal going on it is humanity that has betrayed the planet, and it will fight back too. ( )
  Jennifer708 | Mar 21, 2020 |
Anyone who wants to understand whether human behavior can change the climate need go no further than the Dust Bowl. Hubris and greed caused an insane rush to plow heritage grasslands that saner minds of explorers passing through as well as current cattle folk knew was not fit for the plow. Government policies of free land, as well as land speculators, a couple of good growing years, encouraged speculative farming that left valuable topsoil exposed and led to the largest mass erosion by wind event in the history of North America. Literally tons of soil was displaced over the Dust Bowl, and east of it, sometimes arriving as far east as New York and Washington DC.

Tim Egan's The Worst Hard Time is well researched, poignant, and powerful. If you are interested in the history of the United States or natural history, or even simply stories of people who persevere to the breaking point and beyond, I recommend it. ( )
  jordanjones | Feb 21, 2020 |
Have your notebooks handy when you read this well written, well researched, non-fiction account of the making of the "Dust Bowl" otherwise known as the High Plains of Oklahoma, Texas, Colorado, Kansas and New Mexico. It's packed with tons of information regarding the perfect storm of drought, depression and dust.
Egan uses interviews with the last remaining survivors of the Dust Bowl era to document how it was they went there in the first place, what happened to earn its moniker and its affect on man, animal and agriculture. Throughout, Egan intersperses historical facts which provide a backstory rich in Native American lore and governmental interference.
At some points, this bookumentary is a bit dry, no pun intended, and at some points a wee bit repetitive but overall I highly recommend this book. ( )
  Carmenere | Feb 10, 2020 |
Visa 1-5 av 172 (nästa | visa alla)
The Worst Hard Time," takes the shape of a classic disaster tale. We meet the central characters (the "nesters" who farmed around the Oklahoma and Texas panhandles); dire warnings (against plowing) are voiced but ignored; and then all hell breaks loose. Ten-thousand-foot-high dust storms whip across the landscape, choking people and animals, and eventually laying waste to one of the richest ecosystems on earth.
Racing at 50 miles an hour, the Dust Bowl storms of the 1930's blasted paint off buildings; soil crushed trees, dented cars and drifted into 50-foot dunes. Tsunamis of grasshoppers devoured anything that drought, hail and tornadoes had spared. To the settlers, "it seemed on many days as if a curtain were being drawn across a vast stage at world's end." Families couldn't huddle together for warmth or love: the static electricity would knock them down. Children died of dust pneumonia, and livestock suffocated on dirt, their insides packed with soil. Women hung wet sheets in windows, taped doors and stuffed cracks with rags. None of this really worked. Housecleaning, in this era, was performed with a shovel.

 
On April 14, 1935, the biggest dust storm on record descended over five states, from the Dakotas to Amarillo, Texas. People standing a few feet apart could not see each other; if they touched, they risked being knocked over by the static electricity that the dust created in the air. The Dust Bowl was the product of reckless, market-driven farming that had so abused the land that, when dry weather came, the wind lifted up millions of acres of topsoil and whipped it around in "black blizzards," which blew as far east as New York. This ecological disaster rapidly disfigured whole communities. Egan's portraits of the families who stayed behind are sobering and far less familiar than those of the "exodusters" who staggered out of the High Plains. He tells of towns depopulated to this day, a mother who watched her baby die of "dust pneumonia," and farmers who gathered tumbleweed as food for their cattle and, eventually, for their children.
tillagd av kthomp25 | ändraThe New Yorker
 
Du måste logga in för att ändra Allmänna fakta.
Mer hjälp finns på hjälpsidan för Allmänna fakta.
Vedertagen titel
Originaltitel
Alternativa titlar
Första utgivningsdatum
Personer/gestalter
Information från den engelska sidan med allmänna fakta. Redigera om du vill anpassa till ditt språk.
Viktiga platser
Information från den engelska sidan med allmänna fakta. Redigera om du vill anpassa till ditt språk.
Viktiga händelser
Information från den engelska sidan med allmänna fakta. Redigera om du vill anpassa till ditt språk.
Relaterade filmer
Priser och utmärkelser
Information från den engelska sidan med allmänna fakta. Redigera om du vill anpassa till ditt språk.
Motto
Information från den engelska sidan med allmänna fakta. Redigera om du vill anpassa till ditt språk.
Between the earth and that sky I felt erased, blotted out.
— Willa Cather
Dedikation
Information från den engelska sidan med allmänna fakta. Redigera om du vill anpassa till ditt språk.
To my dad, raised by his widowed mother during the darkest years of the Great Depression, four to a bedroom. Among the many things he picked up from her was this skill: never let the kids see you sweat.
Inledande ord
Information från den engelska sidan med allmänna fakta. Redigera om du vill anpassa till ditt språk.
On those days when the wind stops blowing across the face of the southern plains, the land falls into a silence that scares people in the way that a big house can haunt after the lights go out and no one else is there.
Citat
Information från den engelska sidan med allmänna fakta. Redigera om du vill anpassa till ditt språk.
The banks seldom said no. After Congress passed the Federal Farm Loan Act in 1916, every town with a well and a sheriff had itself a farmland bank - an institution - offering forty-year loans at six percent interest... ...If it was hubris, or "tempting fate" as some of the church ladies said, well, the United States government did not see it that way.
How to explain a place where black dirt fell from the sky, where children died from playing outdoors, where rabbits were clubbed to death by adrenaline-primed nesters still wearing their Sunday-school clothes, where grasshoppers descended on weakened fields and ate everything but doorknobs. . . . America was passing this land by. Its day was done.
Throughout the Great Plains, a visitor passes more nothing than something.
That was Black Sunday, April 14, 1935, day of the worst duster of them all. The storm carried twice as much dirt as was dug out of the earth to create the Panama Canal. The canal took seven years to dig; the storm lasted a single afternoon. More than 300,000 tons of Great Plains topsoil was airborne that day.
Bison have poor eyesight and tend to be clannish, but they are the greatest thermo-regulators ever adapted to the plains, able to withstand temperatures of 110 degrees in summer, and 30 below zero in winter.
Avslutande ord
Information från den engelska sidan med allmänna fakta. Redigera om du vill anpassa till ditt språk.
Särskiljningsnotis
Förlagets redaktörer
Information från den engelska sidan med allmänna fakta. Redigera om du vill anpassa till ditt språk.
På baksidan citeras
Ursprungsspråk
Kanonisk DDC/MDS

Hänvisningar till detta verk hos externa resurser.

Wikipedia på engelska (3)

"The dust storms that terrorized America's High Plains in the darkest years of the Depression were like nothing ever seen before or since, and the stories of the people that held on have never been fully told. Pulitzer Prize-winning New York Times journalist and author Timothy Egan follows a half-dozen families and their communities through the rise and fall of the region, going from sod homes to new framed houses to huddling in basements with the windows sealed by damp sheets in a futile effort to keep the dust out. He follows their desperate attempts to carry on through blinding black blizzards, crop failure, and the deaths of loved ones. Drawing on the voices of those who stayed and survived - those who, now in their eighties and nineties, will soon carry their memories to the grave - Egan tells a story of endurance and heroism against the backdrop of the Great Depression."

Inga biblioteksbeskrivningar kunde hittas.

Bokbeskrivning
Haiku-sammanfattning

Snabblänkar

Populära omslag

Betyg

Medelbetyg: (4.17)
0.5
1 5
1.5
2 23
2.5 8
3 107
3.5 41
4 342
4.5 56
5 328

Tantor Media

En utgåva av denna bok gavs ut av Tantor Media.

» Förlagets informationssida

Är det här du?

Bli LibraryThing-författare.

 

Om | Kontakt | LibraryThing.com | Sekretess/Villkor | Hjälp/Vanliga frågor | Blogg | Butik | APIs | TinyCat | Efterlämnade bibliotek | Förhandsrecensenter | Allmänna fakta | 152,442,462 böcker! | Topplisten: Alltid synlig