Klicka på en bild för att gå till Google Book Search.
Laddar... Beyond the Gates of Fire: New Perspectives on the Battle of Thermopylaeav Christopher Matthew
Ingen/inga Laddar...
Gå med i LibraryThing för att få reda på om du skulle tycka om den här boken. Det finns inga diskussioner på LibraryThing om den här boken.
Seeking to capitalize on the contemporary appeal of movies like 300 and the general reputation of the Battle of Thermopylae, this book presents a series of coherent and interconnected chapters that provide distinct and critical views of the common understanding and regular portrayal of this battle. As is fitting for a book that seeks to provide critical examination of the portrayal of the Battle of Thermopylae, the volume contains a series of chapters that amount to interconnected essays that discuss aspects of the battle and its larger context that are often ignored or not given a great deal of attention, as well as discussing areas that have received a lot of attention but that are highly controversial.
The Battle of Thermopylae in 480 BC is one of the most famous battles in history. The heroism of the 300 Spartans who opted to remain behind to face the full might of the Persian host while their Greek allies made good their escape has become the stuff of legend. The story still inspires novelists and film-makers today (Frank Miller's fanciful 300 was a huge hit in 2007 and the film rights to Steven Pressfield's more historical novel Gates of Fire were bought by George Clooney, the film expected to finally surface in 2011 or 2012). But what is the truth behind the legends and why was this bloody defeat immediately accorded a halo of glory that has endured for nearly two-and-a-half millennia?Beyond the Gates of Fire brings together experts on the classical period from Australia, New Zealand and the United States to take a fresh look at various aspects of the battle. A substantial introductory section by the editors outlines the background to the conflict as well as the arms, armor and fighting styles of the opposing sides. The following chapters (9 of them) then discuss such questions as whether the defense of the pass really was a suicide mission; the exact topography of the battlefield itself in 480 BC, using the latest geological research and core samples; the impact of the battle on the Greek psyche; commemoration of the war dead; the impact of the original battle on the conduct of later battles in the pass, right up to the German invasion of 1941. For the classical scholar or the general reader whose interest has been piqued by the popular books and films, this book is sure to shed refreshing new light on the most famous last stand in history. Inga biblioteksbeskrivningar kunde hittas. |
Pågående diskussionerIngen/inga
Google Books — Laddar... GenrerMelvil Decimal System (DDC)938.03History and Geography Ancient World Greece to 323 Greece to 323 Persian Wars; Union of Greece (500-479 BC)Klassifikation enligt LCBetygMedelbetyg:
Är det här du? |
Ancient descriptions of the battle come from Herodotus and Diodorus Siculus (Plutarch’s description seems to be derivative from Herodotus). The accounts are contradictory for the end; Herodotus has the Spartans retreating to a small hill where they are killed by missile fire while Diodorus has them dying in a failed night raid on the Persian camp; it’s thought that Herodotus’ account is more likely, since he was a near contemporary, but Diodorus found favor with ancients who favored more aggressive tactics.
Discussion of the weapons and arms used by both sides notes that hoplite arms were well suited for the situation. The Persians depended heavily on their cavalry archers, who were useless on the narrow battlefield; Persian infantry used a shorter spear than the Greeks and couldn’t close; Persian foot archers, slingers and javelin throwers couldn’t penetrate Greek armor. (An endnote describes an experiment from 2009; 700 arrows were fired at 20 re-enactors armed and formed as hoplites; there were only three hits in unarmored areas).
Although it’s conceded that the size of the Persian army is greatly exaggerated by the ancient authors, it still would have needed immense amounts of forage and supplies, and the longer it could be kept in place the worse its sanitation situation would become. Thus if the Spartans had been able to hold a little longer, Xerxes’ army might have collapsed due to disease and starvation.
The essay on topography, by the sole American contributor, geologist George Rapp, was of interest. Rapp drilled boreholes at the site and noted that the 480BCE ground surface is almost 60 meters lower than the current elevation (he notes he had some difficulty convincing historians). Alluvial deposits from the Sperchios River and travertine from the hot springs that give Thermopylae its name have widened the original narrow strip between the Gulf of Malia and the Mount Kallidromon. Rapp notes that it’s often casually assumed that Thermopylae was a mountain pass; it’s true there are (and were in 480BC) cliffs on one side but the other side was swampy ground along the gulf.
The essays were all easy reads. I think my view of the battle has been colored by the movies 300 and The 300 Spartans and the novel Gates of Fire so this was an instructive read. Maps and pictures of the area; extensive endnotes; bibliography of ancient and modern authors. ( )