Klicka på en bild för att gå till Google Book Search.
Laddar... The Black Man's Burden: Africa and the Curse of the Nation-State (1992)av Basil Davidson
Ingen/inga Laddar...
Gå med i LibraryThing för att få reda på om du skulle tycka om den här boken. Det finns inga diskussioner på LibraryThing om den här boken. inga recensioner | lägg till en recension
Basil Davidson is among the most widely read and respected of Africa's historians, and is, as Roland Oliver, author of The Cambridge History of Africa, has observed, "the one best trusted in Black Africa itself." Now, in this often brilliant, unfailingly provocative work, he traces the roots of Africa's independence movement and puts the continent's present-day political instability into historical perspective. Emerging from foreign rule in the 1950s, the African people looked hopefully toward a future of independence and self-determination. But today Africa is a continent in crisis. The root cause, argues Davidson, lies in a historical irony--Africa's liberators, reluctant to embrace Africa's own history, chose to form nation-states based on fundamentally flawed European models. Thus, the sectarian strife of Europe was reproduced in Africa, compromising the new nations almost from the moment of their birth. Filled with stimulating insights, The Black Man's Burden tackles some of the most vexing and fundamental questions of our time. Davidson begins with an inquiry into the pathology of nationalism and tribalism, and shows how they have collided in modern Africa. He demonstrates how the colonial legacy deformed (almost from the start) the project of African liberation. For African freedom fighters, mostly schooled in Western ways, could only imagine an African future inspired by the very West whose shackles they sought to break. Even the language of their discourse was derived from the West. Thus, they turned their backs on whatever might have proved useful and usable from their own African heritage. The creation of nation-states, like the Janus-faced nature of nationalism itself, proved, in the event, to be not so much liberating as suffocating. The state, Davidson argues, became a monster, its ever-inflating bureaucracy enrolled in the service of a particular family or ethnic group or tribe or alliance of tribes. Others, in an effort to resist the depredations of the state (or in a refusal to recognize its legitimacy), sought refuge in networks of tribal solidarity and community. Intelligent, passionate, sophisticated, Davidson explores the evolution of nationalism as it has unfolded in both Africa and Europe. He sheds light into obscure corners, combines scholarship with enthusiasm, and accomplishes that rare feat of turning the reader inside out in order to view the world with fresh eyes. He concludes with a reflection on movements of renewal and democracy that are now pushing their way across the continent. Inga biblioteksbeskrivningar kunde hittas. |
Pågående diskussionerIngen/ingaPopulära omslag
Google Books — Laddar... GenrerMelvil Decimal System (DDC)320.96Social sciences Political Science Political Science Political situation and conditions AfricaKlassifikation enligt LCBetygMedelbetyg:
Är det här du? |
The subject is very interesting and the author has much to say about it. His long personal experience in Africa gives him a unique perspective. However, he writes a free-flowing narrative without much theoretical background or structured argument, and I think that limits his conclusions. Especially his portrait of pre-colonial political organizations is hard to grasp. He presents a few case studies and claims that these African governments were accountable to their citizens, but he doesn't actually explain how that accountability functioned. Furthermore, the book is at least 100 pages too long. The author drifts further and further away from his topic towards the end. He makes a 25-page excursion into the history of eastern Europe which yields no information of interest. His final conclusions take another 30 pages, but it seems like he just scribbled them down as random notes without bothering to recall the most important parts of the book.
In conclusion, I think this is a good book but a more critical editor's eye could have improved it. It is perhaps slightly outdated by now (published in 1992), but still a good starting point for understanding Africa's political problems. Jeffrey Herbst's "States and Power in Africa" is another good work on the same subject.