HemGrupperDiskuteraMerTidsandan
Sök igenom hela webbplatsen
Denna webbplats använder kakor för att fungera optimalt, analysera användarbeteende och för att visa reklam (om du inte är inloggad). Genom att använda LibraryThing intygar du att du har läst och förstått våra Regler och integritetspolicy. All användning av denna webbplats lyder under dessa regler.

Resultat från Google Book Search

Klicka på en bild för att gå till Google Book Search.

Blitzkrieg: From the Rise of Hitler to the…
Laddar...

Blitzkrieg: From the Rise of Hitler to the Fall of Dunkirk (urspr publ 1979; utgåvan 1994)

av Len Deighton

MedlemmarRecensionerPopularitetGenomsnittligt betygOmnämnanden
523646,154 (3.7)5
History. Military. Nonfiction. HTML:

A compelling history of Blitzkrieg: the 'lightning war' by which Hitler and his generals overwhelmed the Allied armies in Western Europe.

'Blitzkrieg' begins with a chilling portrait of Hitler's rise to power in pre-war Germany, setting the stage for the outbreak of the Second World War and his conquests of Poland and Norway. This riveting history sets out clearly the tactical thinking behind Blitzkrieg and focuses an expert's eye on the materiel -- pre-eminently the Panzer tank -- that made it possible. Concluding with a compelling account of the campaigns that drove the German armies through the Low Countries and into France, Deighton reveals the Führer's 'fatal flaw', which made possible the evacuation of Allied forces from Dunkirk.

'Blitzkrieg' is the story of Hitler's triumph and Europe's darkest hour. Few writers have understood it as well as Deighton -- an ex-RAF pilot -- and perhaps none has been able to describe it so tellingly.… (mer)

Medlem:jjwilson61
Titel:Blitzkrieg: From the Rise of Hitler to the Fall of Dunkirk
Författare:Len Deighton
Info:Harpercollins (Mm) (1994), Paperback
Samlingar:Ditt bibliotek, ForRecommendations, Owned
Betyg:
Taggar:history, military history, germany, france, great britain, world war 2, @living room, @lr-bookcase2-row1, @unmeasured

Verksinformation

Blixtkrig : från Hitlers uppgång till Dunkerques fall av Len Deighton (1979)

Ingen/inga
Laddar...

Gå med i LibraryThing för att få reda på om du skulle tycka om den här boken.

Det finns inga diskussioner på LibraryThing om den här boken.

» Se även 5 omnämnanden

Visar 5 av 5
This was a wonderful find. To be honest I was not sure what to expect, considering that author is best known as spy novel author, but I definitely did not expect level of detailed information this book gives to the reader.

Author starts with the rise of Nazis and forces, together with paramilitary (Freikorps and SA) and political support they received (masterfully manipulated by Hitler who managed to mercilessly get rid of any and all political opposition, either through violence or through political machinations, by creating crisis and presenting himself as an only solution for them).

We are given picture of events taking place in the society that was crushed after WW1, governed by (unfortunately) incapable government that just could not cope with the economical difficulties and did nothing but provide fertile ground for the radical movement that will play the only card they know will bear fruit for them - ideological indoctrination.

While presenting rise of Nazis to power, author also points out that elements that will later be called Blitzkrieg showed up in merciless Freikorps and [what will later be known as] SA city fighting with the political enemies (especially German communists) - quick assaults by infantry armed with mechanization (trucks, light armored vehicles) and cannons, deployed on every hot spot to quickly overcome the opposition and then move to next front.

I like how role of German Army was clearly given in the first years of Nazis trying to establish themselves as a political force - Army was from start playing the role of kingmaker and unfortunately fell under the spell of master manipulator [who promised the return to martial glory] and willingly became the instrument of horrors to come during WW2. Rommel and his political views (I have to admit I was not aware of this before) prove that German military was fully supporting Hitler and started changing the position only when the tides started to turn and they saw they were heading towards the defeat. Propaganda launched at the end of WW2 (and lasting 'til this day) to clean this disgrace is something that will forever stain the West.

Author then moves to more military centered history and I have to admit he revealed quite a few details that marked the period of German military rise.

First, the idea that blitzkrieg was something new. Author shows how glorifying enemies successes and presenting it as something completely novel is nothing but a way to hide ones own incompetence. In essence what later became known as blitzkrieg was nothing else but a way of warfare that was specific for German armed forces for centuries - quick wars in order to prevent conflict on multiple fronts. Only thing that changed is that speed of forces increased but even this happened only to a degree.
Second, myth of German army as a heavily mechanized force. Bulk of German troops still used horses to move around even by the end of WW2. Elite units (actual mechanized infantry and SS armed troops) used majority of mechanization but rest of Army still used horses to move troops and heavy equipment around. This I agree was in great contrast to very advanced air warfare component of German army but nevertheless it was true. While war industry was enlarged by conquests in East and West of Europe total mechanization of the armed forces never took place.
Third, initiative in combat was something that allowed Germans to succeed. What separated German army from the rest of armies in Europe was high level of initiative given to both troops and officers. They were encouraged to adapt to the situation on the ground and execute the actions in the best way they can, without limitations from the upper echelons (commanders are there just to issue the objective but they do not proscribe the one and only way to achieve it). This proved to be the element to completely shock French and UK forces who were sticking to a rather inflexible (prepared) plans to fight the German army. I was truly surprised by inflexible French army command structure.
Fourth, confirmation that new technology creates awe from the opposition only in the first phases of conflict. Once tanks were identified for what they were (highly vulnerable to determined infantry) they moved from the apex predator to the role of just another weapon in the battlefield that can easily be hunted and destroyed. Same today is happening with UAVs and other "wonder" weapons that military analysts are so amazed with.
Fifth, you can wage war with this or that super weapon but without infantry all gains will very soon be lost. This is confirmed in recent wars too - without infantry to actually control the area no gain in the battlefield can be secured. This was truth before, and will remain truth for many years ahead. Only thing that can change is equipment for these very infantry troops. While tanks were a spearhead for many a German attack it was mechanized and standard infantry that went behind them and secured the area from flank and rear attacks.

Author provides a lot of details for each and every campaign fought - from Poland, Norway to France. It is visible that entire campaign (especially French one) were based off the existing plans from previous years (19th century and WW1) but adapted for new technology and means of warfare. Germans took the initiative and played to the weaknesses of their enemies by sowing fear and paralysis by quick penetration of armored columns. This psychological effect will paralyze the Allies (coupled with their rigid command structure) and enable thinly stretched German forces to cut them off unmolested instead of being targeted from flanks by every force capable of it.

Wherever Germans encountered resistance that was organized they were stopped and required larger infantry and artillery (thus much slower) forces to join the leading tank columns to move forward. Unfortunately there wasn't much of organized resistance at the time.

What truly surprised me in this book is level of details given to the issues of organizing large armor and mechanized forces entering the theater of operations. Even slight change in order was causing havoc on roads and approaches and caused delays when it comes to deploying infantry, armor and support services for the respective divisions. Considering snickering (although I understand it, it is propaganda after all) views of use of mechanized forces in latest war in Europe by the so many experts today, one can only understand that West has forgotten everything when it comes to waging war in large towns and cities (as author shows these were areas where tank attrition for Germans were horrendous, from Poland onwards) or in general heavily wooded and populated areas.

While at the beginning I was surprised by author ending the book about blitzkrieg after Dunkirk I understand his point of view. Up to cut off of Allied forces and forcing the Dunkirk evacuation German actions were what you might call blitzkrieg, lightning fast (reckless and total gamble though, bt again war is always a gamble) advance of armored columns that literary shocked French and UK forces and force them to go from paralysis to withdrawal instead of holding ground. After Dunkirk though front line expanded and with it German speed of advance naturally decreased to become more of a standard army advance and mop up of rest of the French resistance. Also every other theater of operations after France was [again] not blitzkrieg but again standard army advance with higher tempo (due to mechanization and air force leading the way). Once encountering the determined enemy (Russians/Soviets) with production base and covering mind boggling vastness of front, Germans just could not apply blitzkrieg at all and war entered the traditional warfare phase - attrition and destruction of manpower and equipment.

Excellent book with lots of details on WW1 experimental forces (J.C.Fullers project 1919 that was written off as war ended) followed by inter-war development of various mechanized and mobile force concepts tried out in UK and German initial approaches to organization of new forces following WW1 experiences and contemporary works (again by J.C Fuller and Liddell Hart) (and again having great luck of having someone as Guderian to amalgamate all the different tactical and technical approaches into workable new-force model).

As I said incredibly detailed book, describing pros and cons of both Allies and Germans, mistakes they made and how they solved some of the very difficult tasks (Dunkirk evacuation being one of the most complex evacuations I came across in history). As an additional plus, book gives comparison between units and equipment at disposal of every party in the opening years of WW2. I have to admit that now I understand even less the French army considering the mass of equipment they had at their disposal but actually never managed to apply it against the Germans.

Highly recommended book. ( )
  Zare | Jan 23, 2024 |
This was a pretty good book, but it had some information and assertions that surprised me. I've spent my whole life as a war buff, spent much of my youth consumed with WW II, thought I understood how Blitzkrieg theory was actually fought in WW II, but apparently, I'm wrong.

The book gives a pretty good history and summary of German war status, theory, preparation, Hitler's rise, mindset, theories of various military strategists. And then the war finally commences. Obviously, then, if this is well known to others, I'm showing my own ignorance here, but I'd always heard that Germany's Blitzkrieg techniques were unleashed on Poland, before excelling in Belgium and France, and ultimately later Russia, to a degree. If you've believed that too, Len Deighton will argue you're wrong. His thesis is it was not used in Poland, it was somehow not used in Russia, and it wasn't even really used in Belgium. Merely in France, in the Ardennes, to a shocking degree of success. This was news to me, but I'll grant Len authority status and take his word for it.

I wasn't totally stunned at how inept France's leadership, both political and military, was, as I'd read other books on France in other wars of the century where the beaurocracy, logistical and communication nightmares are simply legendary, but it was still a bit of a shock to find out how the previously thought to be best army in Europe/the world was so incredibly fucked up! It took 48-72 hours to relay orders, because the leaders didn't use radios, everything was hand carried (orders), and just because you got orders, you didn't do anything until they had been confirmed one to two more times. By which point the German army was 60 miles behind your lines, destroying your country. Fucking idiots! The British, initially, weren't a lot better, at least not the vaunted RAF, which was disappointing to read, but if the truth hurts, it hurts. Some of the French actually played soldier at Dunkirk, allowing hundreds of thousands of British and French troops to escape to Britain, but again, I continued to be shocked at how willing the French political and military leadership was to surrender to Hitler and essentially conspire in his plot against Jews and others, while the Free French forces in Britain were led by only one real general of note, and we all know who that is. Why France is on the UN Security Council is beyond me. They've insisted they're one of the great world powers, but they got their asses kicked in WW I, went over to Hitler after getting their asses kicked in WW II, lost Indochina (although embarrassingly, America followed France's exact same mistakes with the same results), lost most or all of their colonies, and while they're the centuries biggest losers, they land a permanent spot on the UN Security Council. Don't get it. I've read about how they insisted. THEY HELPED HITLER! They shouldn't have been allowed anywhere near the UN Security Council! Of course, while implicitly bragging about the US in the first half of the century, like an ugly American, I could admit to a number of American "irregularities" that many people wouldn't want known about a LOT of countries around the world where uninvited or unwanted westerners stuck their noses into things and propped up or took down "dictators" all over the damn place, so in the end, maybe the US shouldn't be on the Security Council either, eh? LOL!

Okay, I'll stop with the politicizing. Sorry. It's a good book, an easy read, interesting to those who would find the topic interesting, but stops with the capitulation of France, and I guess I knocked a star off because I wish the author had gone on to address Russia and explain just why that was NOT blitzkrieg warfare -- what the differences were -- because without having studied it in detail lately, it seems like similar tactics were used to launch the Eastern Front, but obviously I'm wrong. I just want to know how and why I'm wrong, and I never got that information from this book, so one star off for that. Otherwise, recommended. ( )
  scottcholstad | Sep 21, 2018 |
Read during Summer 2006

The begining was interesting, with the social and political history from World War I to World War II but it really dragged once it got into the specifics of military hardware and then I just had to slog my way through the battle descriptions. I think if the maps (which seemed to be bad reproductions from plates in a hardcover) had been more clear, the battle descriptions would have made more sesnse but I just felt lost in a sea of details. I liked Invasion, 1940 better.
  amyem58 | Jul 14, 2014 |
I do agree with the preceding review; what I would like to add or emphasize is the readability and helpful articulation ( chapters and sub-chapters) which made the pages fairly fly by. ( )
1 rösta mayreh | Nov 10, 2010 |
Whilst this might seem a little dated, this rather oddly structured book is a fascinating read for anyone interested in the strategy of blitzkrieg. By cutting behind the myth of the German Army's advanced technology it goes a long way to explaining what happened next in the war.
The opening chapters on interwar Germany are fairly standard fare, and to anyone who has studied the period, will not do it justice. The account of Hitler's effective takeover of the German Army is interesting enough, and the account of the campaigns/diplomacy of the late 30s is also interesting.
It is the account of the machinery and tactics of Blitzkrieg that I found most illuminating - the tiny amount of armour available to the German's; the very conventional strategy of the Poland campaign; the German inferiority in every department in the war in France (the opening two weeks of which are, in the authors opinion, one of the few real moments of true blitzkrieg warfare).
I would suggest, it is this lack of strength in depth, and the very specific nature of the terrain blitzkrieg works in, that explain the failure of the Russian campaign, just as much as the weather. It also throws a poor light on the policy of appeasement.
A book for those with an interest in military affairs rather than just politics, but interesting stuff. ( )
1 rösta daniel.links | Sep 17, 2007 |
Visar 5 av 5
inga recensioner | lägg till en recension

» Lägg till fler författare (10 möjliga)

Författarens namnRollTyp av författareVerk?Status
Len Deightonprimär författarealla utgåvorberäknat
Nehring, Walter K.Förordmedförfattarealla utgåvorbekräftat

Ingår i förlagsserien

Du måste logga in för att ändra Allmänna fakta.
Mer hjälp finns på hjälpsidan för Allmänna fakta.
Vedertagen titel
Originaltitel
Alternativa titlar
Första utgivningsdatum
Personer/gestalter
Information från den engelska sidan med allmänna fakta. Redigera om du vill anpassa till ditt språk.
Viktiga platser
Viktiga händelser
Relaterade filmer
Motto
Dedikation
Inledande ord
Citat
Avslutande ord
Särskiljningsnotis
Förlagets redaktörer
På omslaget citeras
Ursprungsspråk
Kanonisk DDC/MDS
Kanonisk LCC

Hänvisningar till detta verk hos externa resurser.

Wikipedia på engelska (2)

History. Military. Nonfiction. HTML:

A compelling history of Blitzkrieg: the 'lightning war' by which Hitler and his generals overwhelmed the Allied armies in Western Europe.

'Blitzkrieg' begins with a chilling portrait of Hitler's rise to power in pre-war Germany, setting the stage for the outbreak of the Second World War and his conquests of Poland and Norway. This riveting history sets out clearly the tactical thinking behind Blitzkrieg and focuses an expert's eye on the materiel -- pre-eminently the Panzer tank -- that made it possible. Concluding with a compelling account of the campaigns that drove the German armies through the Low Countries and into France, Deighton reveals the Führer's 'fatal flaw', which made possible the evacuation of Allied forces from Dunkirk.

'Blitzkrieg' is the story of Hitler's triumph and Europe's darkest hour. Few writers have understood it as well as Deighton -- an ex-RAF pilot -- and perhaps none has been able to describe it so tellingly.

Inga biblioteksbeskrivningar kunde hittas.

Bokbeskrivning
Haiku-sammanfattning

Pågående diskussioner

Ingen/inga

Populära omslag

Snabblänkar

Betyg

Medelbetyg: (3.7)
0.5
1 1
1.5
2 3
2.5 3
3 13
3.5 3
4 23
4.5
5 11

Är det här du?

Bli LibraryThing-författare.

 

Om | Kontakt | LibraryThing.com | Sekretess/Villkor | Hjälp/Vanliga frågor | Blogg | Butik | APIs | TinyCat | Efterlämnade bibliotek | Förhandsrecensenter | Allmänna fakta | 203,215,294 böcker! | Topplisten: Alltid synlig