HemGrupperDiskuteraMerTidsandan
Sök igenom hela webbplatsen
Denna webbplats använder kakor för att fungera optimalt, analysera användarbeteende och för att visa reklam (om du inte är inloggad). Genom att använda LibraryThing intygar du att du har läst och förstått våra Regler och integritetspolicy. All användning av denna webbplats lyder under dessa regler.

Resultat från Google Book Search

Klicka på en bild för att gå till Google Book Search.

Laddar...

Past futures : the impossible necessity of history (2004)

av Ged Martin

MedlemmarRecensionerPopularitetGenomsnittligt betygDiskussioner
712,356,196 (4)Ingen/inga
By nature, human beings seek to make sense of their past. Paradoxically, true historical explanation is ultimately impossible. Historians never have complete evidence from the past, nor is their methodology rigorous enough to prove causal links. Although it cannot be proven that 'A caused B,' by redefining the agenda of historical discourse, scholars can locate events in time and place history once again at the heart of intellectual activity.In Past Futures, Ged Martin advocates examining the decisions that people take, most of which are not the result of a 'process,' but are reached intuitively. Subsequent rationalizations that constitute historical evidence simply mislead. All historians can do is to locate them in time, to explain not why a decision was taken, but why then? To illustrate, Martin asks a number of questions: What is a 'long time' in history? Are we close to the past or remote from it? Is democracy a recent experiment, or proof of our arrival at the end of a journey through time? Can we engage in a historical dialogue with the past without making clear our own ethical standpoints? Although explanation is ultimately impossible, humankind can make sense of its location in time through the concept of 'significance,' a device for highlighting events and aspects of the past. In so doing, Martin suggests a radical new approach to historical discourse.… (mer)
Ingen/inga
Laddar...

Gå med i LibraryThing för att få reda på om du skulle tycka om den här boken.

Det finns inga diskussioner på LibraryThing om den här boken.

Can we truly know history? Better yet, can we truly understand history? Most scholars would acknowledge that we cannot know history, as the past is not completely knowable. But most would say, with varying degrees of certitude, that we can understand history. History is understandable, at least in the sense that we can discover trends in history. We can retrospectively see how events play out or how individuals influence the course of events. At least, we think we can do these things.
Ged Martin, a historian and former professor of Canadian Studies at the University of Edinburgh, believes it is far more complicated than that. In order to understand history, Martin advocates analyzing the decisions that people make. By looking at past decisions, and locating those decisions within the context of their time, we can begin to make sense of history (4). The key to this analysis is the concept of past futures: the future or possible futures that could result from decisions made by historical actors, based on their perception of what those futures could be (111).
But it is not enough to simply examine past decisions. Our examination of these decisions may lead us to attempt to rationalize or evaluate the decision. Martin warns against this; to attempt this is to depend upon evidence that may not exist or, worse, may be misleading (29-30). The most that we can do, as historians, is to attempt to ascertain 'why when' rather than 'why'. It may not be possible or even worthwhile to determine why a decision is made; however, it may give us greater insight into the past if we can locate the decision within its own time and determine why the decision was made when it was made.
Along the way, Martin fleshes out his concept with extended discussions concerning the difficulties of the past: what is a 'long time' in history? Can we make ethical judgments of past decisions and individuals? These discussions are long and tedious. The language is often confusing and obtuse, long and wordy. The examples that are supposed to illustrate and make clear the arguments are drawn from (apparently) the most obscure events in Canadian history the author could find. (While it must be acknowledged that this book began as a series of lectures at a Canadian university, presumably Martin intended this book to serve a wider audience than just Canadian students.) It is possible to answer these two questions in a few sentences, instead of the chapters that Martin devotes to 'clarifying' the issue: it depends. A 'long time' in history can depend on what subject one is studying; whether or not one can make ethical judgments depends on whether it has been a 'long time' since those events took place and how far away their moral sensibilities are from our own (183; 253).
In the context of this discussion, Martin introduces his idea of significance, an idea that validates the study of history, as he understands it. While examining decisions—plotting them within their own time—we can understand some of the why of history; we can make sense of the past—the what of history—by assessing the importance of persons and events. By locating an event in time, we can assess its significance—its importance and relevance to history (190-191). While Martin declines to do so, the layman would probably describe his concept as identifying 'turning points' in history (190), those events whose significance eliminates all other possible past futures.
While the actual practice of history (archival research, etc.) would not change under Martin's paradigm, the intellectual thought processes might undergo significant alteration. Instead of seeking explanations of why things occurred, or seeking to make predictions, or trying to establish causal links between two different events, historians would seek a better understanding of why decisions were made at the time they were made. While the whole past is unknowable, individual situations and events can be assigned significance. For example, the assassination of Franz Ferdinand is probably more significant than the fact that I ate breakfast yesterday; we cannot be certain, though, as not enough time has passed between the present and the latter event.
Martin has some bold ideas for history and the pursuit of history. The idea of past futures is intriguing and well thought out. But its baggage often outweighs the strengths of the book. Each point of the book is overburdened with examples drawn from the obscurest depths of Canadian history; Martin sometimes mentions just last names of past Canadian persons, and the reader is left to wonder who he is talking about. While the language of the book is mostly accessible, it often sinks under the weight of its own verbosity. Despite its weaknesses, Past Futures is a worthy addition to the debate over the practice of history.
  cao9415 | Jan 30, 2009 |
inga recensioner | lägg till en recension

Ingår i serien

Du måste logga in för att ändra Allmänna fakta.
Mer hjälp finns på hjälpsidan för Allmänna fakta.
Vedertagen titel
Originaltitel
Alternativa titlar
Första utgivningsdatum
Personer/gestalter
Viktiga platser
Viktiga händelser
Relaterade filmer
Motto
Dedikation
Inledande ord
Citat
Avslutande ord
Särskiljningsnotis
Förlagets redaktörer
På omslaget citeras
Ursprungsspråk
Kanonisk DDC/MDS
Kanonisk LCC

Hänvisningar till detta verk hos externa resurser.

Wikipedia på engelska

Ingen/inga

By nature, human beings seek to make sense of their past. Paradoxically, true historical explanation is ultimately impossible. Historians never have complete evidence from the past, nor is their methodology rigorous enough to prove causal links. Although it cannot be proven that 'A caused B,' by redefining the agenda of historical discourse, scholars can locate events in time and place history once again at the heart of intellectual activity.In Past Futures, Ged Martin advocates examining the decisions that people take, most of which are not the result of a 'process,' but are reached intuitively. Subsequent rationalizations that constitute historical evidence simply mislead. All historians can do is to locate them in time, to explain not why a decision was taken, but why then? To illustrate, Martin asks a number of questions: What is a 'long time' in history? Are we close to the past or remote from it? Is democracy a recent experiment, or proof of our arrival at the end of a journey through time? Can we engage in a historical dialogue with the past without making clear our own ethical standpoints? Although explanation is ultimately impossible, humankind can make sense of its location in time through the concept of 'significance,' a device for highlighting events and aspects of the past. In so doing, Martin suggests a radical new approach to historical discourse.

Inga biblioteksbeskrivningar kunde hittas.

Bokbeskrivning
Haiku-sammanfattning

Pågående diskussioner

Ingen/inga

Populära omslag

Snabblänkar

Betyg

Medelbetyg: (4)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4 1
4.5
5

Är det här du?

Bli LibraryThing-författare.

 

Om | Kontakt | LibraryThing.com | Sekretess/Villkor | Hjälp/Vanliga frågor | Blogg | Butik | APIs | TinyCat | Efterlämnade bibliotek | Förhandsrecensenter | Allmänna fakta | 203,240,898 böcker! | Topplisten: Alltid synlig