Klicka på en bild för att gå till Google Book Search.
Laddar... Dixie After the War: An Exposition of Social Conditions Existing in the South, During the Twelve Years Succeeding the Fall of Richmond (1906)av Myrta Lockett Avary
Ingen/inga Laddar...
Gå med i LibraryThing för att få reda på om du skulle tycka om den här boken. Det finns inga diskussioner på LibraryThing om den här boken. A South-centric memoir / casual anecdotal history of the Reconstruction period. Provides an interesting perspective on southern feelings and attitudes toward the northern occupying forces, ex-slaves, carpetbaggers and scalawags during the period of military rule after the Civil War. Be warned, if you are at all disturbed by non-PC content you might want to avoid. For example, all the speech of black people is rendered in almost incomprehensible dialect. inga recensioner | lägg till en recension
Based on eyewitness accounts, this book fully and graphically portrays the social conditions which existed in the South during the twelve year Reconstruction period following the downfall of the Confederate States of America. The author deals with such subjects as the oppressive military dictatorship to which the Southern people were subjected, the intrigue of the Loyal (Union) League, the tyranny of the Freedman's Bureau, the corruption of the Carpetbagger Governments, and the rise of Southern secret societies such as the Ku Klux Klan and the Knights of the White Camelia. Inga biblioteksbeskrivningar kunde hittas. |
Pågående diskussionerIngen/ingaPopulära omslag
Google Books — Laddar... GenrerMelvil Decimal System (DDC)309.1Social sciences Social Sciences; Sociology and anthropology No longer used [Formerly: Social situation and conditions]. Replaced by 900s. No longer used [Formerly: Historical and geographical treatment]Klassifikation enligt LCBetygMedelbetyg:
Är det här du? |
At any rate, this book stands as a very interesting testimony of the times and of Southern attitudes about the Reconstruction era at the turn of the 20th century. It is a wholly subjective account, and attitudes about race are far from appealing to a modern sensibility. Blacks are frequently and unblushingly referred to as "darkies," and the superiority of the "Anglo Saxon race" (and the responsibilities of its members to that race's preservation) are taken as givens. Slavery was more or less a beneficent society dedicated to the education and uplift of Africans, who would have done better to remain slaves for another century or two in order to complete their improvement rather than being thrust into a freedom full of decisions and responsibilities for which they were unprepared. The Ku Klux Klan arose out of the desperate, lawless, times, and while there were abuses, mostly served as a benign instrument of law and order. (To be fair, the author describes lynching as evil.) And so forth.
Interestingly, the qualities of the Northern generals who were in command of the various Southern cities and territories immediately after the war are often praised. It was not the military men, according to Avary, who sought vengeance, but their politician overlords in Washington. This part has a ring of truth to it, and, along with the whole proceedings, makes me interested in reading more scholarly accounts of the times. For example, the author describes the disastrous policies around voting, whereby whites were mostly disenfranchised (you had to be willing/able to take an oath that you had never aided and abetted anyone having anything to do with the Confederacy) and blacks were suddenly given the vote but controlled by unscrupulous whites. In addition, failure to take said oath also disqualified a white Southerner from holding public position, opening the way for the Northern carpetbaggers to swoop in, often to their own enrichment and precious little else. Again, these are the picture painted by Avary. I suspect there is more than a grain of truth within. To the extent Avary's description of the voting situation is true, it certainly offers some illuminating background to the struggles around voting rights for Southern blacks in the 20th century.
So this book is in turn gossipy, exaggerated in the telling, ugly in its racial attitudes, usually, one assumes, essentially unreliable in the details, but overall fascinating to read. ( )