Författarbild

För andra författare vid namn Bob Bennett, se särskiljningssidan.

3 verk 80 medlemmar 3 recensioner

Serier

Verk av Bob Bennett

Taggad

Allmänna fakta

Kön
male

Medlemmar

Recensioner

Battles and Tactics is a welcome followup to Commanders and Campaigns. The subject matter is more punchy than the topics covered in volume 1, and I am glad I bought it. However it shows the signs of being put together in a hurry - there are some very clumsy sentences in the book, and the battle maps are very basic. But I think the authors have probably pulled together all of the information available in this book aimed at the interested reader.
 
Flaggad
d.r.halliwell | Jan 8, 2010 |
Very useful book that fills a significant gap in the market - an accessible history of the Successors. It has its faults though. There is only one map in the whole book; the book could have benefited from one map per chapter. Maybe the authors saved the graphics budget for the second book in the series - battles. The other problem is that the history of this period is filled with long Greek and Macedonian names. Confusion is added because the players also have nicknames - in Greek and English - and are sometimes referred to by their homeland too - 'the Carian'. This book needed a cast of characters.
But I am very glad I have the book.
… (mer)
 
Flaggad
d.r.halliwell | 1 annan recension | Sep 10, 2009 |
For length, geographic scope, complexity and spectacular changes of fortune, the wars that followed the sudden death of Alexander the Great were among the most remarkable in Western history. Over forty years of fighting passed before the conqueror's vast Empire settled into the three great kingdoms that dominated the Middle East until the rise of Parthia on one side and Rome on the other. Sadly, however, historians can recover only the outline of this epic from the patchy survivals. Had fate been kind, we would be able to read the first hand account of Hieronymus of Cardia, the memoirs of Ptolemy I Soter of Egypt and Pyrrhus of Epirus, and the distillation of their works and others by the acute later historian Arrian. Of those four sources, the first is extant in an imperfect condensation, the last in a few hundred word summary, and the middle two not at all. To read every bit of evidence pertaining to the military activities of the period is the work of a leisurely day. It's therefore understandable that, while hundreds of books have been written about Alexander, his successors receive limited attention in the academy and almost none in popular writing.

Bob Bennett and Mike Roberts deserve a great deal of credit for trying to fill this gap by producing a coherent narrative for the general reader. True, they are not classical scholars, as one learns from a puzzling thank you to one author's former Latin teacher for "translat[ing] the appropriate fragments from Polynaeus [sic] which was the one key source we could not find in translation". We'll assume that the gentleman was conversant in Greek as well as Latin, for Polyaenus wrote in the former language. What I don't understand is how the authors, who seem otherwise to have been quite diligent in tracking down obscure materials, overlooked Shepherd's old but serviceable version, which was reprinted as recently as 1974.

Falling firmly into the genre of popular history, the book fits the fragments of evidence together into a plausible story, with little indication of how much is solidly grounded in the sources, how much is disputed and how much is sheer speculation. The reader should not believe that we really know what the principal actors thought or felt at any particular moment. Nonetheless, while the authors guess at the whys and wherefores, they seem generally reliable about what actually occurred. I can't criticize them for trying to fill in the interstices; without that effort, the book would be of interest only to specialists (no, not even to them, for they can read Diodorus Siculus, Plutarch, Polyaenus et al. for themselves).

Taking into account what the authors wished to accomplish, their work covers the ground thoroughly and is as clear as any account of such a tangled skein of events can be.There are a few weaknesses: Only a single map, showing the entire Hellenistic world in almost no detail, is provided; there is little discussion of how the wars were fought (perhaps a subject reserved for the promised companion volume); on occasion, people and incidents are introduced without enough explanation for readers who don't know about them already (the casual references to the Harpalus affair being a good example).

These relatively minor cavils do not overshadow the book's considerable merits. It is the most readable and useful account now available for the military history of the Diadochoi. If it is superseded any time soon, I shall be very surprised.
… (mer)
½
 
Flaggad
TomVeal | 1 annan recension | Mar 21, 2009 |

Du skulle kanske också gilla

Associerade författare

Statistik

Verk
3
Medlemmar
80
Popularitet
#224,854
Betyg
3.8
Recensioner
3
ISBN
48
Språk
3

Tabeller & diagram