There are aspects of lucid critical thinking about the UK justice system’s history that should inform many other situations around the world.

There are also mixed in with this rational presentation, a series of unfounded grumpy perspectives that are unsupported and contradictory to the realistic process of social development of a country undergoing transformation heavily impacted by new technology and changes in social fabric.

I would wish there was more imagination about a feasible future scenario that would defend the sort of liberty the author advocates. What should the author think about the current state of pervasive monitoring that is happening outside the justice system?

Worth reading and thinking about where you disagree with the author. ( )